An online journal of commentary, analysis, and dignified rants on national security issues. Other posts on home life, annoying things, and a vast 'other' are clearly marked.
I live and write in Ann Arbor, Michigan. University of Michigan AB and MA from Eastern Michigan University. One term in the Michigan Army National Guard. Former American history instructor and retired nonpartisan research analyst. I write on Blogger and Substack. Various military and private journals have published my occasional articles on military subjects. See "My Published Works" on the TDR web version or under the mobile version drop-down menu for citations and links.
I have finally salvaged my pre-Blogger TDR archives and added them into Blogger. They are almost totally in the form of one giant post for each month. And the formatting strayed from the originals. Sorry.
But historians everywhere can rejoice that this treasure trove of my thoughts is restored to the world.
And for your own safety, don't click on any old Geocities links or any of their similar variations in my posts. Those sites have been taken over by bad and/or dangerous sites. Hover over links first!
Making future invasions of Ukraine more expensive for Russia is not the same as deterring Russia.
My impression is that Ukraine is increasingly challenging Russia's theater-wide initiative with local counter-attacks and its new attack into Russia's Belgorod province. Does this telegraph a new big effort two years after the failed 2023 summer counteroffensive? Or is it just local counter-attacks?
Ukraine's friends begin to look beyond this war, but--and forgive the technical term--this proposal is "stupid":
As U.S.-led talks with Russia and Ukraine progress, without the
Europeans at the table, the 27-nation bloc is pressing ahead with a
steel “porcupine strategy” aimed at building the Ukrainian armed forces,
and the country’s defense industry, into an even more formidable
opponent.
If Russia isn't deterred by the hundreds of thousands of killed and crippled from its invasion over the last three years, a European plan like this will add nothing. And if the prospect of even more casualties and economic pain doesn't deter Russia, this kind of European plan will invite Russia to come back again and again for more territory.
Without giving Ukraine the capabilities to drive the Russians out of Ukraine, Russia will know it is safe to attack again after reloading for a few years. It will gain more ground that Ukraine doesn't have the weapons to drive back.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has called up 160,000 young men for
military service against the backdrop of his war against Ukraine.
Losses have been heavier the last half year, or more, and outstripped recruiting. Will this fill the ranks? Or will it bring in young men more prone to insubordination?
UPDATE (Wednesday): The record wasn't set by much. Perhaps this simply represents expanded training capacity. When does this hit demographic capacity limits?
NOTE: ISW updates continue here. Also, I put war-related links and commentary in the Weekend Data Dump.
I post at The Dignified Rant: Evolvedon Substack. Help me out by subscribing and by liking and sharing posts. I continue posting here on TDR seven days a week, including Weekend Data Dump and Winter War of
2022. I occasionally post short data dump-type items on my Substack "Notes" section.
I try to remain calm in foreign policy, regardless of party, because the first step doesn't have to be the only step. Panicked anger could be appropriate or it could be akin to observing your loved one in vital surgery and screeching as the surgery starts, "Stop that madman! He's stabbing my wife!!" Breathe, people.
As I noted about DOD DEI deletions, "Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a video that mistaken removals
will be quickly rectified. 'History is not DEI,' he said, referring to
diversity, equity and inclusion."
1/5 Yeah, don't make that kind of operational security mistake again. This isn't anywherenearly as bad as a bathroom server for a long-running private email system bypassing government security. Nor is it clear what secret or war plan was exposed. I'm tentatively calling BS on the Signal Kerfuffle. But still, FFS.
If the purpose of American diplomacy is to flip Russia away from China, keeping the talks in Saudi Arabia just between America and Russia is a wise move.
With discussion of the lack of Americans' privacy by even foreigners due to technology, you might want to check out a 2000 book, The Light of Other Days, by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter. I often recall that book in this age. Things could be worse. Even without the book's technology.
How the F-47 improves on the F-22. Also, I had assumed the designation was a call back to the P-47 Thunderbolt. But Trump is the 47th president. Is that job security for Boeing?
2/5 The more I read about the Signal security issue, the more it seems like the screeching reaction here and abroad is inversely proportional to the impact of the breach, which was also limited to the writer. Close the hole, by all means. It is a risk. But the rending of garments is unjustified.
3/5 In regard to the Signal hole, I'd absolutely be upset if an enemy had some of the information revealed. Which is why I want the revealed hole closed. Unless you are suggesting The Atlantic guy is such a threat, the reaction is grossly overblown.
Should Trump follow Eisenhower's example of "ending" the Korean War? That required an American Army corps defending Seoul for decades, with troops still in South Korea. Also, the Korean War ended largely along the pre-war line. Are we going to achieve that with all the land Russia has taken since 2014?
5/5 It was pointed out that the Atlantic editor didn't warn the government Signal group it had a hole in its security. Did Goldberg know he was the only security leak? Or didn't he care if it was a general vulnerability?
Noting "grand strategy is simply 'the sustainable balancing of means and
ends, based on a prudent calculation of the state’s interests and the
threats to those interests'." Sounds right for America. And for Britain, as the author notes, the country is in an awkward position. Then he tosses in premature panic.
This time for sure! "The Ukraine War was another disaster for the Russian army. In 2025
Russian military leaders are calling for another round of reforms, one
that will work." To be fair, they could get good enough.
This last week I've gotten a lot of hits from a few hosts apparently from Japan, China, and Los Angeles that focus on older posts. I have no idea what this is. Weird.
The British are returning to being an off-shore balancer in Europe. Which requires a British Army of the Vistula standing alongside allies to be a true "bleeding ulcer" afflicting continental enemies. Otherwise, the Russians will simply call the police to deal with the lions led by donkeys.
In 1914 Lord Kitchener,
then secretary of state for war, speaking of the cabinet’s decision to
go to war in Europe, thundered, “Did they remember, when they went
headlong into a war like this, that they were without an army, and
without any preparation to equip one?”
Small numbers would be
nothing more than a “speed-bump” against a large attack, as the British
Expeditionary Force was in 1914 and again in 1940. Poor preparation,
small numbers and limited equipment meant their deployment was more an
indication of Britain’s support, rather than real capability to fight a
long war against a peer enemy.
Britain is again in this position. Years of spending cuts
have removed the ability of British forces to prosecute a war against a
peer adversary for an extended time. The number of troops has fallen
from 100,000 full-time trained personnel in 2000, to approximately 70,000 today.
The Danes resisted, largely because of a mistaken hope of English help,
which Bismarck reportedly assessed with the comment, "If Lord Palmerston
sends the British army to Germany, I shall have the police arrest
them."
UK to order third aircraft carrier due to Russia threat[.]
Because of Russia, Britain wants a third aircraft carrier? I didn't think the Royal Navy had enough escorts for more than one! So much for a British Army of the Vistula.
UPDATE: Mere seconds later, I remembered today is April 1st. Well played.
Damn me for posting before I read to the end, where it claimed the ship "will be capable of deploying an estimated infinity-hundred aircraft[.]"
Again. Well played.
UPDATE: If I'd looked more closely at the photo caption or the byline, I surely would have been deprived of the full joy of the article.
NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here.
NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it.
Romania has fallen
to the status of a 'hybrid regime,' the only one in the European Union,
and we have EU politicians and corrupt bureaucrats to thank for it.
Seriously. They believe that the EU rather than the America-led NATO gave Europe its run of peace since World War II ended. The former Yugoslavia and the Russian wars against Ukraine, notwithstanding.
Can Romania's democracy recover? Or is it going to be bullets rather than ballots that determine who sits at the big desk? Heck, Romanians might welcome EU-provided order via 10,000 cheese regulations to escape the rule of local bullets.
Building rule-of-law democracy is hard enough without an outside force hammering away at it. One can expect Russia to do that. The West should not participate.
NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here.
NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it.
For unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) to be more than novelty items, they must complement conventional weapons and be tightly integrated into combined arms operations.
While drones have been around since WWI,
most people only think about air units being used in modern conflicts.
But the Ukraine War has given us a glimpse at how military tactics are
evolving as drones have become a more pivotal part of the strategy, including not only air but also water and land drones.
We're in the crawl stage of crawl-walk-run for incorporating UGVs into combined arms operation. While small land drones for urban warfare are fine, I suspect ground combat drones need to be at least SUV size to have some decent cross-country mobility. The small land drones will get stymied by small ditches and obstacles. Early World War I tanks had to be large to cross trenches and to crush barbed wire. Drone design and tactics to make them part of a force will determine their effectiveness.
The US is still hugely powerful, and Russia remains an acute threat
to its neighbors and wider Europe. However, the idea that the world is
moving from an international liberal order to a 19th-century-style order
of great power spheres of influence is misguided: Washington is
alienating the sphere it had, and Moscow increasingly looks like part of
Beijing’s.
The only real beneficiary of current US and Russian policies is likely to be China.
Yet I reject the idea that America is alienating Europe by pointing out their faltering freedoms. America is trying to shape Europe into countries worthy of being allies with whom we can fight those who would take that freedom away.
On the morning of March 16, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told
Fox News the latest U.S. airstrikes on Yemen's Houthi terrorists is a
campaign "about freedom of navigation and restoring deterrence. The
minute the Houthis say, 'We'll stop shooting at your ships, we'll stop
shooting at your (U.S. recon) drones,' this campaign will end. But until
then, it will be unrelenting."
Despite Iraq's repeated small losses in Kurdistan, her victories on the
rest of the front were coming at such a rapid pace that Iran was near
collapse. In the atmosphere of this pending disaster (increasingly
apparent even to Iran's leaders), a tragedy in the Gulf weighed in with
possibly decisive consequences on the mind of the Ayatollah Khomeini. On
July 3, 1988, in the midst of a confusing clash with Iranian forces in
the congested Strait of Hormuz, the American cruiser Vincennes
mistakenly shot down an Iranian Airbus 300 that entered the combat area.
All 290 aboard were killed. Khomeini tried to use this incident to whip
up renewed anger against Iraq, but the Iranian ground forces were too
far gone to rise to the challenge. The combination of Iraqi battlefield
dominance and Tehran's perception that America was willing to stop at
nothing to crush Iran led the Ayatollah Khomeini to accept U. N.
Resolution No. 598, which called for an end to the war. On July 16,
1988, Iran formally accepted the resolution.
Caving in to the superpower America was a convenient excuse for Iran to end the war with Iraq. It obscured Iraq's sudden string of battlefield victories where Iran once frightened the world. And that ended the Tanker War.
So while I welcome an unrelenting air campaign that can suppress the Houthi anti-ship campaign. The Houthi and Iran will remain intact to rebuild the threat unless Houthi boots no longer control the ground.
UPDATE: An admiral's support for boots on the ground. Although I'll say it's early to say the aerial campaign has failed to temporarily suppress the anti-ship capabilities. And no word on whose boots hit the ground.
NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here.
NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it.
NOTE: I mined the image from my old DALL-E account rather than risk Bing's hyper-sensitive "standards" that make being a national security blogger more difficult than is necessary.
The war is in a purgatory between war and peace. Troops on the front will have to work out mixed feelings about fighting. Russians may or may not believe they fight NATO, Nazis, and Satan in Ukraine but they have been willing to fight. Ukrainians fight to survive as a country. But with peace held out to the troops, hope of surviving the war becomes a more prominent thought. What happens when enough troops decide they don't want to be the last soldier to die in the war?
Both sides are suffering from the effects of more than three years of war. Diplomacy gets much more media attention than the battlefield, excepting Ukraine's retreat from much of the Kursk salient and the big Ukrainian drone strike on Engels-2 airbase deep in Russia.
I suspect that many Ukrainians will be relieved to end the war with whatever territory negotiations can get back rather than relying on more dead Ukrainians as the price. And I fear that the costs that Russia has paid in lives and economic damage is stopping Putin from easily ending his invasion without a result commensurate with the price Russia has already paid. But can Russia possibly increase the ratio of gains-to-price with more war, when its monthly total casualties are 20,000 to 35,000 now with minimal gains? That seems like a poor betting strategy.
And while the war will end in the form the militaries created, the
settlement will be a matter of statecraft, as all political negotiations
are. Bluff and bluster are the tools of negotiations, though human
factors – pride and shame – will play a part too.
Aside from not angering American diplomatic efforts with clear intransigence, both sides must approach talks to "end" the war carefully to make sure their troops don't lose the will to fight first.
Col. Dmytro Palisa, commander of Ukraine’s 33rd Mechanized Brigade,
instructs his soldiers to ignore speculation about a possible
cease-fire.
“They start relaxing, they start overthinking, putting
on rose-colored glasses, thinking that tomorrow will be easier. No,” he
said in an interview at a command post on the eastern front. “We shoot
until we are given the order to stop.”
If the war's end seems imminent, soldiers naturally act differently to avoid being the last to die. Russians no doubt face the same--if not worse--hope for survival.
President Donald Trump said he was “very angry” and “pissed off” when Russian President Vladimir Putin criticized the credibility of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s leadership, adding that the comments were “not going in the right location.”
NOTE: ISW updates continue here. Also, I put war-related links and commentary in the Weekend Data Dump.
I post at The Dignified Rant: Evolvedon Substack. Help me out by subscribing and by liking and sharing posts. I continue posting here on TDR seven days a week, including Weekend Data Dump and Winter War of
2022. I occasionally post short data dump-type items on my Substack "Notes" section.
This was a good movie and his point on procurement gold plating true. But to be fair, the Bradley turned out to be an excellent combat vehicle. The Ukrainians love them. And saying the Bradley wasn't good for counter-insurgency (flat bottom vulnerable to mines) ignores it wasn't designed for that.
War on terror continues in Iraq: "ISIS’s chief of global operations, the second in command for the
terrorist group, was killed on Thursday in an American airstrike, U.S.
Central Command said."
Recalling the Falklands War. In a college poli sci class during the war, a fellow student proclaimed the British had no chance on land because they didn't have 3:1 advantage. I said if the British landed, they'd smash the Argentinians because the 3:1 "rule" works with combat power--not numbers.
Rebuilding a pluralistic Syria to keep ISIL down is folly as a Western objective. If Syrians manage that--and there is no evidence the Islamist victors seek that--good on them. Offering Christians refuge should be the limits of our effort.
A "relatively" inexpensive anti-drone missile. Only auto-cannons can really be cheap enough, IMO. Unless one missile launcher is cheaper than numerous auto-cannons protecting the same area.
I seriously doubt North Korea has a SSBN. I have doubts that it has usable nuclear weapons rather than nuclear devices requiring thousands of scientists and technicians to detonate.
I don't have to believe Hamas propaganda to have my heart broken by the plight of Gazan children. Lay the blame on Hamas for launching a rape and murder invasion. And blame Hamas for using the children as human shields rather than surrendering and ending the horrors of war inflicted on the children.
This is well beyond perfectly lawful boycott. It is getting closer to terrorism. Which is a step to insurrection. Let's keep this a law enforcement problem by squashing it now. Tip to Instapundit.
Interesting article, but America's debt problem is hardly imperial over-stretch. Defense spending as burden on the economy is much lower now than in Cold War. It is domestic spending over-stretch on one side of the ledger. And regulatory over-reach on the other.
Should Poland and South Korea have tactical nukes? Not so fast. Well, precision weapons can do most of what old tactical nukes did. So I can't see Poland benefiting. Tactical nukes that could reach Pyongyang would help South Korea. But that's a strategic effect.
The UN "happiness index" is a sham. All such "studies" are designed to let Europeans believe their sad standards of living are okay because Americans aren't really happy with all that wealth. I wouldn't be shocked if the Definitions Section defined bug cuisine as a source of happiness.
Is Bangladesh the next Afghanistan? India had best double the guard. I've had recent alarming Weekend Data Dump entries on that "model" Moslem country that once had little Islamist extremism. #WhyIslamCan'tHaveNiceThings
The collapsing Russian rail network. Sabotage, accidents, and (from prior posts) sanctions--like ball bearings--are finally eating into the ability to cope.
Bing seems to be blocking my perfectly reasonable requests for post illustrations more often lately. I guess a defense orientation is inherently dangerous according to their parameters. Has Bing tightened its limits?