As the pace of an offensive-defensive battle increases with cheaper munitions, I don't know how you can have a human in the AI loop when you are fighting in the shade.
US Army soldiers in Europe are readying for large-scale combat and the kind of overwhelming missile and drone attacks Ukraine is facing, where the massive number of threats can make it difficult for humans to keep up, and are looking to software for solutions.
It will be like two phalanxes pushing and slashing against each other. You can't afford a human causing your effort to falter and give the edge to the enemy.
Decisions in human hands must be in the realm of the broader picture and not within the actual exchange of fire. Is writing the AI version of rules of engagement the best way to have human hands on this system? Are programs of engagement the way for all but the biggest decisions that fall outside of the POE?
NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here.
NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!
NOTE: Image from my linked phalanx essay. [I added the last two sentences shortly after publishing. I meant to clarify the final statement with this angle.]








