Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Fear is the Beginning of Wisdom

When an enemy issues a threat, too many here quake in their boots. And when one of our leaders makes a threat to the enemy, too many here quake in their boots. Stop that. 

General Grant put it well to his subordinates during the 1864 Wilderness Campaign after they pestered him with worries about what Lee could do when Grant's army marched:

Oh, I am heartily tired of hearing about what Lee is going to do. Some of you always seem to think he is suddenly going to turn a double somersault, and land in our rear and on both of our flanks at the same time. Go back to your command, and try to think what we are going to do ourselves, instead of what Lee is going to do.

Precautions are good. But force protection is not the objective when America goes to war (quoting my 1997 Iran-Iraq War paper):

Our soldiers' lives are indeed valuable, and our country's insistence that we minimize risks to them is laudable (as well as being necessary due to the small size of the Army). Undue concern, however, is false compassion and, as was the case for Iraq in 1980, could result in even greater casualties in a prolonged war should we refuse - because of the prospect of battle deaths - to seize an opportunity for early victory.
Obsessing on force protection measures should not paralyze our war effort. Our enemies should spend more time terrified about what America will do to them. 

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!

NOTE: Portrait from here.

Monday, March 23, 2026

The Winter War of 2022 Peeks Behind the Facade

Did Ukraine's winter counter-attacks expose the Russian ground force juggernaut as a hollow facade? Is this just the most apparent problem? Things seem different enough from the continuity of the big picture over the last several years to make me wonder if Russia has serious problems.

The war goes on. But things seem ... different:

Ukraine has been imposing increasing challenges on Russia at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels since the beginning of 2026.

ISW in early March assessed the Ukrainian counter-attacks exploiting Russia's loss of Starlink communications:

The cascading effects that the Ukrainian counterattacks in the Oleksandrivka, Hulyaipole, and Zaporizhia directions have generated in other sectors of the front show how constrained the Russian force structure in Ukraine really is.

And as the counter-attacks have continued, ISW stated:

Ukrainian counterattacks in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast are forcing Russia to redeploy forces and means from other areas of the frontline and likely from operational level reserves.

If Russia needs more than local reserves to cope with apparently smaller scale counter-attacks, what does this say about the supposed juggernaut of Russian troops that continues to grow? 

Over the last couple years I've repeatedly called into question the reality behind the image of a relentless steamroller that Russia tries to create with reports of always expanding troop numbers:

I have strong doubts that Russia is managing to increase the raw numbers of its troops fighting inside Ukraine to continue its grinding offensive as long as it takes. Does Putin have a Potemkin Invasion Force? Would he even know he only has that?

Russia has maintained the strategic initiative with continuous attacks somewhere along the long front. This helps to conceal any Russian weaknesses on the ground. Ukraine exposed the weakness in its August 2024 offensive into Russia's Kursk region. There are probably more such weak points. Ukraine's strategic defensive strategy of trading space for time to inflict much heavier casualties on the Russians than the Ukrainians suffer has supported Russia's strategy, in effect, by leaving those Russian weak points untested.

How much will Ukraine's counter-attacks cascade? Can Ukraine's new corps formations exploit this to create a counteroffensive? 

Russia is still living in another world:

The Kremlin is likely setting informational conditions to expand Russian demands of Ukraine and NATO by making it clear that its current demands are no longer sufficient.

Really? Putin and what army? 

Could this troop shortage I've suggested exists, if true, push Putin--if he is aware of it--to change course to end the war? 

Are Russia's threats to NATO at Narva, Estonia, and aid to Iran to target American and allied targets around the Persian Gulf desperate efforts away from the main war to change the apparently ... different ... situation in their invasion of Ukraine? 

And (okay, this is my last string of conditional events that lower the overall odds of it happening) would that plan explain Russia's new efforts to be able to shut down the Internet in Russia? Can't have angry or confused Russians using it to express opposition, eh? Tip to Instapundit.

I've often said I try not to let my hopes guide my analysis. It is difficult. But there is an opposite problem. When the situation has been mostly the same for years, it is easy to assume current trends will continue. 

Is this a blaring alarm about Russia's capacity to wage war?

Russia suffered its deadliest day of the year in Ukraine on Tuesday, losing more than 1,700 troops in 24 hours.

Ukraine’s general staff said it had killed or wounded 1,710 Russian troops on March 17 and destroyed 29 artillery systems as well as 230 vehicles and fuel tankers.

It could just be a bigger example of the same old thing as Russians batter themselves against Ukraine's defenses. Russia is now using armored vehicles again:

Russian forces are increasingly conducting mechanized assaults on the frontline, possibly as part of intensified preparation for their Spring-Summer 2026 offensive.

Perhaps Russia over the past year got the Ukrainians used to fighting infantry assaults and calculates that resuming mechanized assaults with accumulated armored vehicles will break those defenses optimized for slower attacks.

Maybe. But things seem ... different ... now. 

UPDATE (Monday): This certainly doesn't contradict my gut feeling (that is hopefully a distillation of lots of data points bouncing around in my head):

Even with all this money spent on recruiting, after four years of war in Ukraine and over 1.3 million soldiers killed, disabled or missing in combat, Russia is having problems recruiting soldiers. 

NOTE: ISW updates continue here

NOTE: Also, I put war-related links and commentary in the Weekend Data Dump on Substack. You may read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved.

NOTE: Map of Ukrainian gains in this year's counter-attacks from ISW.

Sunday, March 22, 2026

Weekend Data Dump

The Weekend Data Dump is a compilation of short entries about the previous week’s news that I found interesting. I couldn’t possibly comment on everything in my news flow or delve into everything that interests me. So most news that interests me doesn’t make the cut for a post. The rest go in the data dump. Enjoy!

Duplicating the Weekend Data Dump here and on Substack is too much of a hassle. I'm just moving it THERE. So hop on over and read it! On the bright side, you can comment on Substack!

In case you missed it on Substack: Conventional Air Power as a Counter-UAV Asset

In case you missed it on Substack: Chum, Despondency, and Whiplash

In case you missed it on Substack: Distributed Artillery

In case you missed it on Substack: NATO's Achilles Heel

Help me out by subscribing on Substack and by liking and sharing posts. I occasionally post short data dump-type items (or not-so-short) on my Substack "Notes" section

Saturday, March 21, 2026

The Strategy That Dares Not Be Named

There is method to Trump's apparent madness on the global stage.

One aspect of America’s foreign policy of strengthening America's position in the world is weakening our foes:

Donald Trump’s behaviour during this presidential term reveals a surprisingly deep strategic logic.

The core goal remains to restore absolute American superiority over China and Russia. But Trump wants to avoid confronting these major rivals directly. He is rather working to isolate Beijing and Moscow from their international partners and deprive them of any major means of external support.

At the same time, Trump is building a program of sustained economic, technology and other sanctions to markedly weaken the Chinese and Russian economies over the longer term.

Pushing our allies--often done bluntly without running the language through the State Department to sand down the rough edges--to spend more on defense rather than rely on America is another aspect.

Consider too that talks to end the Winter War of 2022--publicly bolstered by some kind words from Trump--may (and this is sheer speculation by me) quietly involve discussions on splitting Russia from China, which is the ultimate prize for isolating this shaky alignment. 

Will Russia or China decide it wants to be the partner with America on economic cooperation rather than a target of economic isolation and potential war?

I've long wanted this type of shift. It makes sense to try. But I can't say I know we are doing this, of course.

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!

NOTE: I made the image with Bing. 

Friday, March 20, 2026

NATO's Achilles Heel

Because Substack apparently doesn't allow search engines to identify articles there, I'm going to try publishing the introduction here and see what happens. 

NATO is vulnerable at the city of Narva on Russia’s border. While its Russophile citizens may not actually be happy with experiencing the loving embrace in practice as Ukrainians have suffered under and rejected, Putin could pretend they do to justify invasion. Ultimately, Narva’s main defense is prying Belarus from Russia’s imperial grasp.  ... [CONTINUE READING]


Will Russia Bow Or Pivot?

Is Russia going to settle into vassal status under China's thumb? Or will it stand up and finally pivot east to the real threat?

I've long figured vassalage is the path Russia is on. The war against Ukraine is accelerating that journey. This author looks at the question:

To what degree will Russian dependency on China continue after the war? I predict this dynamic will be centered on two competing forces: China will serve as the economic lifeline for Russia, with the latter expected to align within the former’s sphere of influence. At the same time, Russia will attempt to reduce this dependency by developing alternatives to China with success depending on its level of geopolitical isolation following the war.

In the short run, Putin wrecked his military enough to require him to continue his post-Soviet policy of appeasement of China while he rebuilt Russia and its military. The result should be alarming in Moscow:

Russia is increasingly dependent on China for economic support and help in rebuilding an economy ravaged by more than four years of war in Ukraine. China is willing to help, but not as an ally but as a patron for its new Russian client state. China seeks to turn Russia into a vassal state. 

In the long run, to break free Russia will have to erase the long-term need for China and the pointless and insane framing of NATO as a threat to Russia. Does anybody doubt Europeans would reverse rearmament if Russia pivoted east and stopped behaving like total a-holes?

If Russia can admit that China is their primary enemy, as Russia rebuilds its military--again--it could have the power to organize resistance to China if Xi's priority of undoing the Century of Humiliation hits too close to home, and earn NATO support to do so.

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!

NOTE: I made the image with Bing.

Thursday, March 19, 2026

Distributed Artillery

Because Substack apparently doesn't allow search engines to identify articles there, I'm going to try publishing the introduction here and see what happens. 

Can the Army get rocket launchers that roam the battlefield for ground support and air defense? I’m skeptical of filling a complex battlefield with unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) that we can command and control in large numbers. Artillery robots might be a proof of concept before trying to bring in direct-fire UGVs.  ... [CONTINUE READING]


The Camp Followers Move Their Camp

Iraq imported the logistics element for Sunni jihadis from Syria. I'm sure this will work out just swell. 

The camp is notorious? 

Around 22,000 Iraqis have been transferred to Iraq from the notorious al-Hol camp in Syria, which housed the families of fighters from the terrorist group Islamic State, according to official figures.

The fighters terrorists are the notorious aspect. And the families were basically the logistics arm of the "fighters."

Pray they don't attract new jihadis around their new logistics hub homes in Iraq and resume functioning as logistics depots. 

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!

NOTE: Photo from the article. 

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Chum, Despondency, and Whiplash

Because Substack apparently doesn't allow search engines to identify articles there, I'm going to try publishing the introduction here and see what happens. 

I’ve long been worried about the Royal Navy. Britain’s inability to rapidly deploy warships to protect British interests has been revealed by the Iran War. Britain is being forced to confront the shock that its once globe-spanning fleet cannot rule even portions of the seas. ... [CONTINUE READING]


The Iran War of 2026

America, Israel, and associated powers are winning the military campaign against Iran. Western opinion is skewed by American domestic politics. Yet allied victory of some sort is likely. What form is acceptable in the short run remains unclear.

I've covered the Iran War of 2026* in two essays (here and here) plus numerous smaller posts in Weekend Data Dumps and in my Substack Notes. 

We are clearly winning the military campaign so far. Talk of Iran really winning because they are enduring the ass-kicking is weird but common. Not that Iran hasn't hurt us or our allies with their (weakened) military. Enemies do that. War isn't target practice with a nice little bonus in your paycheck the next month.  

And now, increased emphasis is on securing the Strait of Hormuz enough to allow oil exports to resume. Was this a failure in the initial plan? Or was it considered too much of a warning to Iran to see escort and counter-mine assets gathered? Perhaps the need to take out the leadership in a fleeting moment accelerated the start of the campaign. Perhaps we knew the world would survive a few weeks without the exports in order to gain surprise. I can't know what the thinking was. 

As I noted in that first linked essay, Trump succinctly stated our objectives when he addressed remarks to the Iranian people:

When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take. This will be probably your only chance for generations.

Opposition to the U.S. president contorts much of the war analysis. And a fixation on having THE PLAN spelled out to the final victory as if that is wise in an ongoing war--or even relevant when no plan survives contact with the enemy--is not new. Plans are a framework that must be flexible in the face of reality. And the president described that flexibility if you'd accept that rather than insisting on seeing the operational orders.

Preventing Iran from getting nukes is the obvious military and political objective. Overthrowing the mullah regime is the ideal political outcome to do that. And destroying Iran's conventional military and weakening its internal security apparatus is currently the main effort by volume. This both reduces the mullah ability to harm and intimidate neighbors for years; and increases the ability of internal actors (many of the people and hopefully defecting security forces) to drive from power the mullah regime and their Revolutionary Guard base of power.

So far it doesn't seem as if the internal security forces are sufficiently weakened. Yet I assume Israel has the uprising portfolio in the campaign. I have no idea where they are in that effort. They aren't saying.

You can see the divisions between America and Israel from presidential statements and allied target focus. Israel is first up in Iran's nuclear crosshairs and so is obviously more committed to regime change than America. America as a global power has broader concerns and doesn't want a long war in this narrow theater. So America and Israel approach even the same war we are jointly fighting with very different perspectives.

So if Iranians can't rise up successfully now, America will finish its military campaign and pocket the relatively inexpensive narrow military win that knocks down Iran's conventional and nuclear capabilities. And Iranians will have lost their best shot at freedom "for generations." Then American and Israeli plans will need to be adjusted for the long run.

UPDATE (19MAR26): I don't think this threat by the president to let others worry about keeping the Strait of Hormuz open is serious literally (tip to Instapundit).

Our advantage in not relying on Persian Gulf energy directly is a wartime--as in The Big One--advantage. That's why the Strategic Petroleum Reserve was established. It was to buy time for our military to regain access to foreign oil if we went to war with the USSR. It is easy to forget that when it is now used to lower gasoline prices.

Keep in mind that fact when you hear America is not reliant on Persian Gulf energy. In peacetime America is absolutely reliant on Persian Gulf indirectly. Our allies and trading partners rely on that energy. And our economy and prosperity relies on trade with them.

Further, the Gulf allies we are now getting more cooperation from in the Iran War of 2026 rely on oil exports. If we were really going to leave the Strait of Hormuz for someone else, we'd be given a week to evacuate our bases in the Gulf and the Gulf Arab states would cut a deal with the mullahs for peace.

Just saying. The president's statement was commentary on our allies' unwillingness and/or inability to send warships to the Gulf to assist us in a war that benefits them and us (remember the possibility of mullah nukes?)--and hopefully the Iranian people, too.

UPDATE (19MAR26): The U.S. may send additional ground forces to CENTCOM to expand options. With Marines on the way by sea, Army Rangers and a brigade of the 101st Airborne Division could be useful for taking Iran's island bases in the Gulf

UPDATE (19MAR26): Not nearly as bad as I feared. And Iraq's government doesn't seem in any hurry to stop us from hitting back: "Iranian-backed Iraqi militias continued to launch drone attacks targeting US forces and interests in Iraq." Also, ISW provides updates on the war.

UPDATE (19MAR26): Are Japan and some of the NATO European states edging toward contributing to Strait of Hormuz security?

*And really, this is a campaign in the 47-year war since the Iran Revolution and their invasion of our Tehran Embassy and subsequent lengthy hostage crisis. But it is common to call any upsurge in organized violence a "war." So I usually do. But it isn't really that. Although the difference is indistinguishable to those fighting and paying the price for fighting.

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!

NOTE: Image adjusted from WorldAtlas.com 

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Conventional Air Power as a Counter-UAV Asset

Because Substack apparently doesn't allow search engines to identify articles there, I'm going to try publishing the introduction here and see what happens. 

I observed regarding the Iran War of 2026 that we are ignoring the power of conventional air power to disable enemy drone attacks while we curse our failure to pay attention to Ukrainian air defense skills in the face of Russian drone and missile attacks.  ... [CONTINUE READING]

 

Indian Seapower

India needs seapower as Pakistani weakness reduces the conventional threat from the west and as the Himalayas limit the conventional threat from the north.

India's land problem with Pakistan has been reduced as India's relative power increased over the army with a UN seat across its border. And while India borders China, the Himalayas are India's long walls that prevent decisive land defeats. So India goes to sea:

Both China and India, as rising powers, see the value of having a blue-water navy. India views dominance in the Indian Ocean as essential for projecting power and protecting critical trade routes. Additionally, it is very well aware of its neighbors’ naval build-up and sees fit to make its own plans for naval reform and expansion. In accordance with this principle, the Indian Navy has come to focus on three main areas: aircraft carriers/naval aviation, anti-submarine technology, and a transfer to domestically designed and produced weapon systems.

I believe India has the advantage on the land front from geography. So yes, China is the only real threat to India at sea. 

Yet India has it's advantages to help keep China from using the Indian Ocean. With one exception

But I must say, I have my doubts that India's corrupt and inefficient defense industry can achieve one of their main objectives of designing and producing major weapons systems.

NOTE: TDR Winter War of 2022 coverage continues here

NOTE: You may also like to read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved. Go ahead and subscribe to it. It's the right thing to do!

NOTE: Photo from the Indian navy.

Monday, March 16, 2026

The Winter War of 2022 Seeks Rescue From the Trenches With Strategic Bombing

Russia's invasion of Ukraine prompted the West to rebuild its military capabilities and its defense industrial base. Will Russia's turn to strategic bombing against Ukraine's electrical grid inspire the West to build much-needed resiliency in its own electrical grid before we too are tested in a war?

Russia is seemingly turning to strategic bombing to break out of the ground stalemate that its ground forces have been unable to end with a breakthrough or collapse of Ukraine's ground forces:

With a decisive breakthrough in Kherson and Kharkiv now beyond reach, the Kremlin has reoriented its plans. Rather than seizing territory, it is systematically dismantling the infrastructure that allows Ukraine to function by targeting the energy facilities that power its defenses, sustain its factories, and keep its people warm.

It is part of preparations for an expected summer offensive, which Moscow hopes will finally put it in a position to dictate terms for peace

Ukraine has already turned to strategic bombing on a smaller but more focused scale to escape the war of attrition that Russia has imposed on Ukraine. Ukraine has seemingly succeeded into dramatically increasing its kill ratio against Russian troops by slowly retreating while battering the advancing Russians.

This is looking more like the Iran-Iraq War when both sides sought to break out of the stalemate with a "War of the Cities" where each battered the other's civilians. Those campaigns were intermittent unlike the Russian efforts, especially, in the Winter War of 2022, and so did not decide the war.

The difference in the current war is that Russia is harming civilians with its broad energy generation campaign; while Ukraine is focused on military logistics and manufacturing. 

If the West bolsters Ukraine's capacity to repair battle damage to their electricity production and distribution network, that would greatly improve Western electric grid resiliency during war. I think this is probably more urgent than learning about small drone usage from Ukraine.

And Russia's campaign reflects Allied strategic bombing of Germany in World War II, which forced Germany to divert air defense resources to the homeland at the expense of the front:

Every missile and unit expended against a $20,000 Shahed drone targeting a regional substation is one less interceptor available to cover frontline positions in the Donbas. Russian infrastructure strikes force Kyiv to repeatedly choose between protecting its grid and protecting its soldiers.

So air defenses able to protect the home front is a big lesson from the Winter War of 2022

Back to the Iran-Iraq War, despite efforts at striking civilians and oil exports, the war was decided on the land by an Iraqi counteroffensive that smashed the Iranian troops long immune to their own slaughter. And of course, Germany was defeated on the ground in World War II. So what is going on with Ukraine's counter-attacks? Last week ISW assessed the Ukrainian counter-attacks exploiting Russia's loss of Starlink communications:

The cascading effects that the Ukrainian counterattacks in the Oleksandrivka, Hulyaipole, and Zaporizhia directions have generated in other sectors of the front show how constrained the Russian force structure in Ukraine really is.

I like to get my hopes up:

A relentless and meticulously planned drone campaign is choking Russia’s front-line forces, expanding the so-called “kill zone” threefold in some areas. 

Ukraine learned this from Russia on some sections of the front. 

But I hate to rely on my hopes. Yet after four years, morale on one side or another could crack.

NOTE: ISW updates continue here

NOTE: Also, I put war-related links and commentary in the Weekend Data Dump on Substack. You may read my posts on Substack, at The Dignified Rant: Evolved.

NOTE: I made the image with Bing.

Sunday, March 15, 2026

Weekend Data Dump

I'm duplicating the Weekend Data Dump on Substack. You can read it there if you prefer. Or if you really want to comment online.

Help me out by subscribing on Substack and by liking and sharing posts. I occasionally post short data dump-type items on my Substack "Notes" section

In case you missed it on Substack: The Iran War of 2026 Seeks a Victory Condition

In case you missed it on Substack: Surprise On the Modern Battlefield

In case you missed it on Substack: The 2026 National Defense Strategy Report

In case you missed it on Substack: Russia is a Liability as China's Wartime Ally

The Taliban in Afghanistan have severe problems. Five years after we decided to lose the war, the Taliban’s continuing weakness demonstrates that we screwed the pooch in a winnable war.

So no need for Tomahawk? “France is building long range drones for Ukraine. Details were not revealed, but the same French firm produced an AAROK long-distance drone with a 22 meter wingspan carrying a payload of about three tons.”

Not as prepared as we thought: “Trump administration officials conceded during a private briefing on Capitol Hill this week that Iran’s Shahed-136 drone is proving more disruptive on the battlefield than the Pentagon had anticipated[.]” Sh*t happens.

The Shield of the Americas is intended as a multilateral body for unified action against drugs and foreign threats to security in the Western Hemisphere—the foundation of American global power.

Nimitz heads to sea to train prior to one last mission before decommissioning.

Testing a Minuteman III ICBM with MIRVs.

Switzerland is looking at a European system to supplement their Patriot system, whose missiles are in high demand right now. And fewer F-35s because of costs.

Britain is allowing America to use British bases to support “defensive operations” in the air campaign against Iran.

Two unnamed Gulf countries are upset that America didn’t warn them about the coming war. Really? The build up should have been a clue. And to be fair, the warning would have made it to Tehran. Also, nukes?

Iran’s continued strikes on Gulf countries is renewing calls for cheaper air defenses in the region. Sure, make that a priority before prestige high-tech stuff that isn’t being used, eh?

The joint American-British “Project Flytrap” for multi-echelon offensive counter-drone capabilities.

Mixing quality and quantity of munitions for the Pacific theater.

North Korea tested a long-range cruise missile (with nuclear implications) from its new destroyer.

An Iranian strategist with ties to the mullah regime says Iran has no intention to accept a ceasefire. I’m sure Iran didn’t expect to have to endure more than a brief, limited assault. Maybe they are right that they can outlast us. But they also may not have a choice but to try.

The search for Syria’s post-Assad future. I don’t know what it is. But I’m pretty sure we can’t tame the Islamists.

I reject the idea that Trump’s preferred military strategy is a totally new way to use our military power. It is basically an aerial version of old-fashioned punitive naval expeditions or mobile ground raids into enemy territory to inflict pain. They reduce costs—but have limits, too.

Sounds good: “France is working with partner countries to facilitate increased shipping transit through the Strait of Hormuz once the most intense phase of hostilities is over[.]”

I’m assuming an American destroyer is the system: “A ballistic missile launched from Iran was neutralized by NATO defence systems while entering Turkish airspace, Turkey’s Defence Ministry said on Monday.”

The U.S. is unhappy with the scale of Israeli strikes on Iran’s oil supplies. I guess this shows we haven’t decided to punish the mullahs over the hope of overthrowing them.

F**k. A Navy missile seems to have hit that Iranian school rather than an Iranian air defense missile falling back to Earth. Iran didn’t use them as human shields; we didn’t deliberately try to kill children; and this is heartbreaking. Although the evidence as described seems weak.

In regard to escorting civilian shipping through the Persian Gulf, it would help to have Navy in a Box.

The X-76 to reduce reliance on vulnerable airfields. But can dispersing maintenance, rearming, and other logistics match that ability?

American B-1 bombers arrived in Britain to conduct “defensive” missions in the war on Iran from a British base.

Ukraine is “fielding thousands of [UGVs], which perform logistics, engineering, and infantry support tasks. Some even drive explosives into Russian positions as kamikaze robots.” This is important. But I have developed strong doubts about direct-fire combat UGVs.

Is Epic Fury doomed? Bold stand claiming to know what the objective will turn out to be.

Note this is done without the public angst in Europe on the same issue: “The U.S. Defense Department and its Indo-Pacific partners are undertaking several initiatives to ensure the region has a strong industrial base ready to respond to warfighter needs[.]”

Mexico recoils from fighting drug cartels, saying America must contain “the voracious American appetite for illicit drugs, and … illegal arms trafficking.” Decades ago Mexico’s government said the same thing and enjoyed drug money fueling their economy. Now it fears the cartels.

Canadian provinces are getting restive after “Trudeau’s lost decade featured not only stagnant growth but also flatlining living standards and soaring housing prices.” And don’t forget tighter federal control.

Okay, but America has never had the raw military power to deter all enemies. And enemies may not judge our strength by raw military power. Jihadis calculate with different variables. Still, a good reminder that diplomacy is a tool to support national interests.

The limits of machine guns: “Ukraine is producing interceptor drones to destroy Russian Geran attack drones flying high enough to avoid Ukrainian truck-mounted heavy machine-guns that destroy low-flying Shahed 136 drones.”

True: “Verified combat results that demonstrate Operation Epic Fury has achieved U.S. military and political objectives will determine the length of war, not a calendar with an arbitrary deadline.” The objective is as yet unclear. Which is fine and not a scandal, as we match ends to means.

Russia is building up forces in Kaliningrad and the Baltic region. Kaliningrad is both a threat and opportunity in NATO’s main front in the Baltic region.

The intelligence leak is shameful—and criminal?—and harms our maximalist goal—but not necessary goal.

Calling the war on Iran a “little excursion” is wrong—even if an attempt to calm markets is understandable—when we ask military personnel to risk their lives. But don’t pretend this is new. Remember “time-limited, scope limited military action”?

Sh*t got real: “Finland’s government has proposed scrapping a Cold War-era blanket ban on nuclear weapons on its territory[.]”

Meanwhile in the eastern Pacific: “The U.S. military said it killed six men Sunday in a strike on an alleged drug-smuggling vessel in the eastern Pacific Ocean[.]”

About 75% of Americans oppose sending ground troops into Iran. That’s reasonable. Iran is too large and mountainous. Yet I no more want to rule out Army operations there than I do in INDOPACOM against China. Never let an enemy rule out a threat.

Never mind earlier reports that Nimitz has been recalled for one last mission in CENTCOM. She is sailing around South America on her way to her final home port, and is “not certified for national tasking.” My friends and I geeked out about her when she joined the fleet.

A snapshot of where the Navy’s CSGs and ARGs are underway.

Rather than “use them or lose them” as fast as possible, Iran seems to be trying to keep their missile threat intact. This sort of reminds me of Saddam’s attempts to preserve his air force by burying planes in the desert and by flying planes into Iran for the duration of the war (but Iran kept them).

Capturing, securing, and evacuating Iran’s enriched uranium would require a large ground force and not just special forces. I did not think it was a reasonable mission at this point.

Israel and America are striking pro-Iran militias in Iraq; so far those militias are fairly quiet. I’m not hearing complaints from the Iraqi government about the strikes.

War: “The United States military announced Tuesday that its forces had struck and destroyed 16 of Iran’s minelayers near the Strait of Hormuz.”

The Army is getting a new hand grenade. No explicit mention of whether it is for left- and right-handers. That was an issue for me in Basic Training. Also, the picture disturbs me. I was taught all fingers go on the safety lever.

The Navy began an Arctic exercise that included a nuclear attack sub breaking through the ice.

Army HIMARS have apparently been firing anti-ship weapons at Iranian warships.

Will all Air National Guard units that are losing F-16s to retirement get replacement aircraft?

Learning how to operate artillery in the Arctic under drone threats. Drones need to adapt to operate there, too.

Hmm: “After the U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran began, the Chinese air force stopped flying around Taiwan—and the reason isn’t at all clear.” If China ends up capturing Pratas Island after what turns out to be a maintenance stand-down, don’t be shocked.

My thoughts on our “failure” to learn from Ukraine’s drone defense experience before taking on Iran.

There is some truth to this observation about sustaining medium-sized wars, but let’s not get misty eyed over the unity of global war against peer enemies. And we do have an option of converting the current medium war against Iran into a limited war.

I’d say refraining from declaring mission accomplished in Venezuela is from the “Well, Duh” files, but winning the first battle is absolutely not winning the war.

Britain needs an army but it probably won’t get it. My dream of the British Army of the Vistula dies.

The French elites spent so much time telling people that their worries and problems were “fascist” that more people became willing to endure that slur to have their worries and problems addressed.

Too many are taking counsel of their fears over dealing with the severe Iranian mullah threat rather than focusing on causing fear in the ranks of the mullahs. What is “reckless” is letting the mullahs get nukes.

The way the EU and Britain have rewarded Gazans for their rape, murder, and kidnapping invasion of Israel, I’d have thought they’d reward West Bank Israeli settlers with their own state, too.

Iran hit several cargo ships near Iran.

Well, yes: “Israeli officials in closed discussions have acknowledged there is no certainty the war against Iran will lead to a collapse of its clerical government[.]” From the start I judged overthrowing and pummeling Iran’s government are parallel objectives.

The U.S. may need to shift air defense units in South Korea to CENTCOM. Since the Cold War, reliance on the Air Force for air supremacy led the Army to get rid of a lot of air defense assets. That must change.

Tragically, an American missile may have hit that Iranian school based on bad intelligence. Damn. On the other hand, how many more school children will be at risk if Iran gets nukes? Or at risk just from terrorism if the regime continues?

Western Hemisphere security: “Ecuador will launch a major offensive against criminal organizations in three western provinces this weekend with logistical support from the United States[.]”

Australia will deploy an E-7 aircraft to CENTCOM and replenish the UAE’s supply of AIM-120 air-to-air missiles.

The crew of a Chinese helicopter behaved like total a-holes too near an Australian helicopter over the Yellow Sea.

Huh: “U.S. Marines and soldiers rehearsed inserting mobile missile launchers capable of long-range precision strike and anti-shipping missions across the Hawaiian Islands last month ahead of Western Pacific deployments.” My speculation.

American troops in the field can find and strike targets much faster than bureaucrats back home can develop and field new weapons. That has always been the case, but I get the point.

Virginia boats have become the backbone of America’s submarine fleet. And collectively they will replace our four SSGNs and their Tomahawk arsenals.

“Alaska will kill you.” Indeed. How about POLARCOM?

Israel hit an Iranian nuclear facility.

Iran demands reparations to end war. A bold strategy Cotton. Let’s see if it pays off.

China is mediating between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Indonesia has blue water naval ambitions.

The dangers of a weak Iran? LOL. I’ll take my chances with that outcome given the problems with a confident and well-armed mullah-run Iran. Add in nukes …

Yeah, the West fought Islamist “over there” for nearly two decades, only to welcome Islamists "over here" (and subsidize them).

Cuba says it wants to talk to America. Thug states always want to talk to save themselves. Too often, we fall for it.

Every time I see a Tai Chi commercial on YouTube I want to throw a brick through the screen.

Strategic warfare: “Ukrainian forces conducted a Storm Shadow cruise missile strike against a critical Russian microchip manufacturing plant in Bryansk City on March 10.”

An American refueling aircraft crashed inside Iraq, apparently after a refueling mishap with another plane. The other plane safely landed. All six KC-135 crew died in the crash. F**k.

In the Red Sea, Ford “experienced a non-combat fire Thursday that was successfully doused, the U.S. Navy announced.” Damage control is vital.

While this could be seen as a failure to anticipate, it may have been a matter of not wanting to telegraph the start of the war: “The U.S. Navy is not yet ready to escort oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, but it will happen.” We’ll see if it includes Marines (or Army airmobile troops).

I don’t understand the professed confusion about America’s war objective against Iran. It has been clear to me from day one. But it is unclear which objective will be achieved.

Hmm: “Israel renewed its strikes on Beirut on Thursday, as it threatened to expand operations and seize territory in Lebanon if Hezbollah did not stop its attacks.” I’ve been skeptical that long-term success is possible without a ground effort.

This deal would be a form of an American security guarantee: “Ukraine is awaiting White House approval for a major drone production agreement proposed by Kyiv last year[.]” I imagine we have a greater sense of urgency now.

Romania granted America permission to use bases there for operations against Iran. Also, ahem.

Meanwhile in SOUTHCOM.

LOL. As if.

If Iran was pummeling America as hard as America (and Israel) is pummeling Iran, you’d laugh at anyone claiming time is on America’s side.

The Navy has revived its interest in railguns. Good.

Why in the world would we use SEAL Team 6 to capture Iran’s Kharg Island oil export facility when we can shut it down with air strikes, rockets, or sea mines—or seizing any tanker that departs there with a full load?

The American shift from expensive long-range missiles to much cheaper and more plentiful short-rang precision bombs after knocking down Iran’s air defense door demonstrates one way to cut the exquisite weapon Gordian Knot dilemma.

If you think Iran can endure being pummeled by America as long as they have to, explain why you think a nuclear-armed, mullah-run Iran could be deterred from using nukes against even another nuclear power.

Europeans can’t consider Iran somebody else’s war? Of course they can. All they have to do is firmly believe someone else will be the nuclear weapons target and someone else will then deal with Iran.

America needs resilience in the vast supply chain of raw materials and critical components that build and sustain our war machine.

I recall we sent elements of our OPFOR to Iraq for a similar purpose: “Russia recently sent five of its military instructors to Ukraine for three months to gather information and gain experience in the latest combat methods.”

Make it so: “While the United States Navy has long used modular construction techniques for its submarines, it now wants to expand this to include construction of its new class of FF(X) Frigates.” We need that technique.

The European Union plans to destroy democracy in order to save it. Well of course it does. “Democracy Shield”, indeed. Shielding the EU from democracy, eh?

Yes: “Ten days ago, the Trump administration decided to win a 47-year-long war waged by Ayatollah Iran against America and -- at various times -- two dozen other nations.” I don’t know if we get final victory in this campaign. But I’m reasonably sure we’d lose without it.

If China invades Taiwan’s Pratas Island, expect it to be surrounded by a Chinese fishing fleet militia. Hell, could PLA troops PVA concerned individuals on the fishing vessels simply take the weakly held island? But I imagine the CCP would want their modern military filmed in victory.

I’ve argued the War on Terror now requires quieter but persistent mowing the grass overseas. Bizarrely, we brought the war on Islamist terror here. Tip to Instapundit.

People not familiar with the military manufactured a steak and lobster scandal where none exists: “Our relationship and understanding of our military and military families is broken.” To our troops, enjoy the steak and lobster. You earn it every day. Tip to Instapundit.

I heard that China sold Iran advanced anti-ship missiles and that our Navy shot down all of them. Huzzah! But I’m not finding the purported Reuters story. I found a February story about talks to sell them. But nothing about actual sale and use. Filed as low-confidence RUMINT for now.

So … they’re doing what Trump wants: “Canada to Expand Military Presence in Arctic, Following Trump Threats[.]” Mission accomplished!

The U.S. temporarily eased oil sanctions on Russia to ease price pressures from the Iran War of 2026. This buys time for Russia’s economy.

It amuses me that some say the war against Iran is really about China. As if Iran isn’t bad enough now and wouldn’t be a catastrophe with nukes. Also, effects aren’t neatly siloed.

Iran: “The US-Israeli combined force continued to target Iranian internal security infrastructure on March 13 in order to degrade the regime’s repressive capabilities.” Netanyahu said they are setting “optimal conditions” for regime overthrow. Which fits with my initial view.

It’s fascinating that some claimed the 2014 Russian invasion of the Donbas that continued for years was a brilliant “frozen conflict”; but when the campaign against Iran nears two weeks The Atlantic can speak of U.S. problems “the longer the Iran war drags on.” Via Instaundit.

CENTCOM hit 90+ military targets on Iran’s Kharg Island oil export hub. As a reinforced Marine battalion on USS Tripoli heads for CENTCOM, Trump says we could destroy the island’s oil facilities. Will we take it (without damage??) to coerce Iran into letting oil traffic sail? My view.

A capability useful in the western Pacific: “US forces used ATACMS to sink Iranian warships during Operation Epic Fury, the top US general said.”

An argument for regime change? “the Strait of Hormuz will re-open only with the consent of the Iranian government. No amount of U.S. naval power can either force passage or safeguard transit.” But the claim is wrong. Depending on the price we and allies are willing to pay.

You can market it as a disguised retreat: ““This is a good time to declare victory and get out,” David Sacks, Trump’s AI and crypto tsar, said on the All-In podcast he co-hosts.” But that has always been a real victory option depending on facts on the ground.

An unhealthy obsession by “Not-Americans” up north led their commander to sacrifice the fingers and toes of their troops, proving that Canadian troops are not immune to Arctic conditions. What part of “the Arctic wants to kill you and break your stuff” is unclear? Via Instapundit.

Beginning of the end or end of the beginning for Cuba’s commies? Or the pause that refreshes them, I suppose. Tip to Instapundit.

America helps Ukrainian troops own the night (and fog).

Meanwhile on the Subcontinent (and adjacent Afghanistan).

CRS report to Congress on Epic Fury. Good but brief background information.

Trump on the war with Iran: ““Let me say we’ve won. You know, you never like to say too early you won. We won. We won, in the first hour it was over, but we won.” I suspect this is letting Israel know the clock is ticking on their regime-change plan.

As I said: The false choice between defeating Iran and deterring China. Via Instapundit.

Huh: “Protesters took to the streets in a violent night of unrest in Cuba as demonstrators chanted ‘Down with Communism’ and attacked Communist party offices[.]” Via Instapundit.

Ukraine’s suicide drone with AI target identification and terminal guidance. This was predictable.

Xi seems serious: “Xi seems unwilling to halt the purges at the cost of military effectiveness. These are Xi’s priorities and after things settle down, planning to take Taiwan can proceed again.” Hopefully the purges are just spitting in the ocean.

Pressure: “A Swedish court on Sunday ordered the detention of the Russian captain of a ship that was suspected to be sailing under a false flag in the Baltic Sea[.]”

Iran continues to bombard Israel.