The French Display Nuance Deficiency

For something in Le Monde, this assessment is woefully deficient in nuance.

I can't even quote anything because it isn't coherent enough to do so. After a long history lesson in IRA hunger strikers, the author--ignoring that the British did defeat the IRA and ignoring the subtle difference that we are not occupying any Islamist country that is resisting us--says that President Obama must give in and do what it takes to end the hunger strike in Guantanamo Bay before one of the lovelies dies.

Strangely, President Bush managed to endure the horrors of having those murdering jihadi bastards being content to simply kill themselves without taking any innocents with them. Yet President Obama can't survive jihadi hunger strikes?

What's the world gonna do? Stop worshipping him? Oh please! President Obama sends remotely piloted unicorns around the world to smite jihadis and hardly anybody says a thing.

President Obama ordered the Navy to dump the carcass into the sea to become chum. World reaction? Shrugs all around.

President Obama got the friggin' Nobel Peace Prize on the same day he bombed the moon!

If President Obama nukes North Korea or Iran, our president will get another one simply for not being Bush when he pushes the button. Surely he had good reason, the international fan base will conclude. How could he not have good motives? He isn't even Bush!

The international community says it is wrong to force feed the little darlings who won't eat. I say let the jihadi scum in Gitmo die. Who cares? I don't. Nobody should care.

And the world won't care one bit because President Obama is our president. I may not like that fact, but I am willing to take advantage of it.