Let's look at one example of how this international community enforces its collective will, shall we?
Darfur is a good place to start. The Deeply Concerned (The Deeply Concerned is a registered trademark of the American Left) condemn the war in Iraq where we saved many from the tender mercies of Saddam's regime even as they ramp up their campaign to compel President Bush to "do something" about Darfur where the Moslem Sudanese government is attempting genocide and ethnic cleansing against the black African population of the region.
Strategypage describes this situation and concludes:
Caught in the middle are the humanitarian aid groups, who must feed the fighters along with the refugees (or get killed for refusing). The foreign aid groups call for peacekeepers, but Sudan relies on other Arab nations to protect it from a "foreign invasion." Sudan has also brought in Chinese firms to operate the newly developed oil fields. Thus Sudan is assured that China will veto any UN attempt to impose peacekeepers.
Eventually, Sudan apparently hopes to force the two million black Sudanese in refugee camps to move to new camps outside of Sudan (most likely Chad.) That way, Sudan will have got rid of a "disloyal population" and rewarded the Arab tribes in Darfur. Most of this operation will have been paid for by foreign aid donors and the UN. And there's not much the aid donors or the UN can do about it.
Aid groups funded by the UN are essentially the logistics arm of the killers? How can anybody complain about this result? Given that the international community is mostly composed of thug regimes that have the veto protection of a couple thug permanent members on the Security Council, this result is clearly the intent of the international community.
Remember, when it comes to genocide being enabled by the UN and the internationl community it represents, it is a feature and not a bug.
