An online journal of commentary, analysis, and dignified rants on national security issues. Other posts on home life, annoying things, and a vast 'other' are clearly marked.
I live and write in Ann Arbor, Michigan. University of Michigan AB and MA from Eastern Michigan University. One term in the Michigan Army National Guard. Former American history instructor and retired nonpartisan research analyst. I write on Blogger and Substack. Various military and private journals have published my occasional articles on military subjects. See "My Published Works" on the TDR web version or under the mobile version drop-down menu for citations and links.
I have finally salvaged my pre-Blogger TDR archives and added them into Blogger. They are almost totally in the form of one giant post for each month. And the formatting strayed from the originals. Sorry.
But historians everywhere can rejoice that this treasure trove of my thoughts is restored to the world.
And for your own safety, don't click on any old Geocities links or any of their similar variations in my posts. Those sites have been taken over by bad and/or dangerous sites. Hover over links first!
The
increased frequency of underwater infrastructure damage across Europe
has raised legal challenges related to the jurisdiction and ownership of
undersea cables, which may limit NATO’s ability to respond.
The
majority of critical undersea infrastructure is located in
international waters, which means would-be saboteurs can take advantage
of oversight gaps.
The effects of the sabotage are in NATO states. Case closed. Claiming we can't react is just doing Russia's legal work for them to pretend there is a loophole that prevents NATO from responding. The urge to ignore this war is strong.
Please tell me our foreign policy isn't to have the Europeans arm up and expect them to fight to defend America. That didn't work out so well in the first half of the 20th century. It was folly when Obama proposed it. And it is folly now.
The United States is no longer an ‘ally’ of Europe, according to a
former high-ranking figure in Nato. In an interview with Times Radio,
Stefanie Babst, erstwhile deputy assistant secretary general of the
alliance, said President Trump has ‘switched sides’ and aligned the US
with Russia, led by the ‘war criminal’ Vladimir Putin. ‘I don’t think
that the Trump administration is prepared to really commit any longer to
Nato, to the trans-Atlantic alliance as such,’ said Babst, ‘and he
couldn’t care really less for European security.’
Israeli defenses on the border with Gaza were scaled to deal with the worst-case threat Israelis expected and not the threat Hamas planned and executed.
Can Russia survive peace? Of course, to ask that question is to assume that Russia can survive more war.
The war goes on. Same death and destruction. New week. Although I will say that it feels like Ukraine is counter-attacking on a small scale more frequently the last few weeks. And it seems like Russian advances are slowing down. I don't know if this is is a new trend that will expand or just a blip.
The Kremlin is intensifying a campaign launched in late 2022 and early 2023 to prevent the emergence of an independent veterans-based civil society and an influx of alienated veterans in Russia likely because it perceives the demobilization of Russian veterans as a potential threat to regime stability.
But Russia can never be in NATO, even if Russia becomes a democracy. If NATO members have trouble thinking it should worry about the Dnipro River, those members aren't going to defend the Amur River.
Ukraine said on Tuesday it would do all it can to maintain its ties with
the United States, after President Donald Trump paused military aid to
Kyiv in the most dramatic step yet in his pivot towards closer ties with
Russia.
The military aid is paused and not ended. I'm assuming intelligence sharing and other such things continue during the pause.
But I hope the military aid suspension is brief so that Ukrainian troops on the front aren't affected. Memories of the 2021 Afghanistan Skedaddle Debacle may not have faded enough.
In a related item, I heard or read--I can't remember where, but the important thing is that the observation isn't originally mine--that Russians are upset with the seemingly friendly Russia-America vibe. After decades of propaganda about the faux America threat through NATO, having the Russian government treat America like a friend aligned with Russia is causing great dissonance.
How will that affect Russian troops supposedly fighting and dying to save Russia from Nazis, NATO, and the Devil?
UPDATE (Tuesday): One reason I think the breach between Trump and Zelensky will be healed is that the entire televised meeting was 90+% amiable. Those panicking seem to have only watched four minutes of mutual anger. I admit that the four minutes were disconcerting to me. I said so last week.
But the public display of mutual anger and frustration was triggered by Zelensky. Perhaps too used to applause wherever he goes in the West, he failed to act like a man whose country needs America desperately. He instead--for those disastrous few minutes--acted like a rock star signing autographs and taking selfies for fans. Adjust fast, President Zelensky.
UPDATE (Tuesday): I don't think we should pressure Zelensky into resigning to promote peace talks. Maybe do Putin first.
This is hardly a shock, notwithstanding the hyperventilating. Nor was timing it to coincide with the president's speech to a joint session of Congress.
And I'm sure Zelesnky understands that speaking about how peace must not be a ceasefire that simply gives Putin a chance to reload should be done in private talks.
The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) is reportedly developing a plan to partially demobilize a limited number of mobilized personnel no earlier than July 2025, likely to address growing societal backlash over the lack of rotations and demobilization of Russian mobilized troops for over two years.
Well that's interesting.
NOTE: ISW updates continue here. Also, I put war-related links and commentary in the Weekend Data Dump.
I post at The Dignified Rant: Evolvedon Substack. Help me out by subscribing and by liking and sharing posts. I continue posting here on TDR seven days a week, including Weekend Data Dump and Winter War of
2022. I occasionally post short data dump-type items on my Substack "Notes" section.
The Russians don't pursue good or evil--just empire: "Russia is trying to negotiate a deal with the new Syrian government for
continued use of these bases. Russia offers cash and other benefits. The
new Syrian government needs all the help it can get."
"Maximum pressure" is back: "The U.S. Department of State is today designating 16 entities and
vessels for their involvement in Iran’s petroleum and petrochemical
industry."
Trump has absolutely not ordered a U-turn in policy to abandon Ukraine. I say this as someone who has long backed Ukraine against Russian domination. Support for Ukraine continues. What we see is often uncomfortable diplomatic posturing. If you feel whiplash, it is self-inflicted. Breathe, people. Breathe.
We need nuclear gravity bombs. If you want a limited perhaps single strike to show seriousness whether it is a first or second use, using a missile risks a major miss. Circular Error Probable means there is a 50% chance the warhead lands outside the circle. Potentially way outside. Gravity and wind limit bomb misses.
What American allies provide enough defense capabilities. GDP burden is crude. I know it over-states Greece's spending. Willingness to fight at our side and endure casualties are good measures for seriousness. That counts a lot. Interesting final number based on five categories. But I think it is ... off.
Trump: "the European Union was formed in order to screw the United States.
That’s the purpose of it, and they’ve done a good job of it." True. But he's talking about tariffs. It is much, much bigger than that.
Because doing that would be stupid: "Israeli media reported on Thursday that the Israeli army will not
withdraw from the Philadelphi Corridor on the Egypt-Gaza border, as
agreed in the ceasefire deal."
I think we'll see Hamas victory dances scaled back: "Israeli decision-makers plan to resume the Gaza war in four to six weeks
with overwhelming force, sending in tens of thousands of troops to
conquer the entire strip in a single coordinated offensive against
Hamas."
Ukraine produces lots: "In some sectors of the front drones inflict 90 percent of the
casualties, but overall drones are responsible for about 60% of Russian
casualties." FPV drones are personnel-intensive precision ammunition. And require other forces to keep the Russians fixed to be targeted.
FFS: "Almost 100 Air Force Academy cadets have admitted to cheating or
tolerating it during a weekly knowledge test, typically required for
freshmen." What does holding them accountable mean? Do we need to sacrifice them to remind future and current officers that their oath matters?
FFS: "The Air Force will inspect its entire fleet of 89 KC-46A Pegasus aerial refueling tankers after cracks were found on two of the four new planes set to be sent to the Military Delivery Center"
Sometimes memory fails you. I try to keep that in mind and sometimes qualify statements with "if memory serves me." I recently discovered I started referring to Rumor Intelligence as RUMORINT. I actually checked and years ago I evolved from RUMINT to RUMORINT. Oops. I fixed the errors.
The World War II Axis saw our enemies take big risks with little chance of success, to our ultimate advantage. We might eventually see Russia's decision to invade Ukraine three years ago in the same light. China might do that, too. Is this baked in to autocratic leadership?
Each strategic mega-gamble—Hitler’s
double-cross of Stalin, Japan’s move against Pearl Harbor—made a certain
sense in the mental world Axis leaders inhabited. Taken together, they
were a master class in self-harm. No matter how close the Axis came to
victory, no matter how impressively their militaries performed, there
was something perverse about strategies that risked everything on a mad
rush for hegemony—with strategic death as the consequence of failure.
And if the decisions were perverse, so were the processes that yielded
them.
Regardless
of the self-harm German and Japanese decisions unleashed in themselves, a lot of
people still suffered and died to defeat the nearly doomed decisions to
wage big wars to achieve greatness.
I'm not sure where you put the 1944 Allied D-Day landings in France, which if a failure would have led to an invasion a year or two later. Or perhaps landing in France at Soviet-controlled ports.
But the point is still good. But don't draw comfort from the notion that China would never be so foolish as to roll the dice by going to war with America and its allies. If you are counting on that legendary Chinese long-range thinking, guess again.
It has been proposed that container ships with weapons and equipment in shipping containers could create auxiliary cruisers to provide needed numbers for the Navy. I proposed the same thing many years ago.
In the past half decade, innovators have heeded calls to increase the
Navy’s ship count by putting containerized missiles on merchant ships.
They have improved the weapons, drones, and sensors to the point the
Navy is experimenting with mounting them on container ships.
Even so, U.S. politicians, military leaders, and analysts continue to
overemphasize the number of destroyers, cruisers, frigates, etc., the
Navy needs. But the Navy has acknowledged it cannot meet its goal of
380-plus ships any time soon[.]
This included stormy weather, ship design, propulsion issues and how
containers are lashed together, including varying regulations around the
latter. The degradation of containers and resulting metal fatigue could
also be considerations.
One reason our military budget is so large is that we have to spend so much just to get our troops and equipment to the fight overseas and sustain them there even before we train and equip one member of our military. We got used to not thinking about that. That's a problem if we don't want isolated troops surrendering in large numbers overseas.
The U.S. military’s reliance on commercial providers for sealift and
airlift is not viable should a conflict arise, and the Defense
Department is hoping partnerships with allies will improve its
sustainment processes, a Pentagon official said Feb. 11.
We've also gotten used to the luxury of doing maintenance back in the continental United States instead of overseas. But what was a sanctuary in the "end of history" era is no more.