Wednesday, July 09, 2008

But Not Distracted

Admiral Mullen's comments will surely lead anti-war types to insist we are distracted from Afghanistan by Iraq:

The nation's top military officer said yesterday that more U.S. troops are needed in Afghanistan to tamp down an increasingly violent insurgency, but that the Pentagon does not have sufficient forces to send because they are committed to the war in Iraq.


This requires you to believe that the real fight against al Qaeda is in Afghanistan and not Iraq. But Mullen provides a clue here:

"I don't have troops I can reach for, brigades I can reach, to send into Afghanistan until I have a reduced requirement in Iraq," Mullen told reporters at the Pentagon. "Afghanistan has been and remains an economy-of-force campaign, which by definition means we need more forces there."


The article set this view forth clearly for the reading comprehension challenged:

Members of Congress and critics of the Iraq war have argued for years that Iraq has diverted resources from the fight in Afghanistan. Mullen's comments underscore the effect of keeping roughly 145,000 troops in Iraq. Unlike the critics, however, Mullen sees both wars as vital to creating a stable region and wants to wait for sustained progress in Iraq before trying to shift resources.


Iraq, in other words, is not a distraction from Afghanistan as much as it is a higher priority mission that must not be risked for the less important Afghanistan mission.