Sunday, December 10, 2006

Getting Real About War Reporting

Via National Review Online, this article says that the world thinks we are indiscriminantly killing civilians in Iraq even as we exercise extreme care in avoiding civilian deaths during combat operations:

The [Pew Global Attitudes survey] found that over 90 percent of Jordanian, Moroccan, Palestinian, and Turkish respondents and over 80 percent of Indonesian and Pakistani respondents felt that the United States "didn't try very hard" to avoid civilian casualties in Iraq. That view was shared outside the Muslim world by over 70 percent of the Brazilians, French, Russians, and South Koreans polled.

And yet, despite some dark spots on its record, the U.S. military has done a better job of respecting noncombatant immunity in Iraq than is commonly believed. Over the past year, I have conducted dozens of interviews with commanders, judge advocates, and others who have served in Iraq; investigated operational "lessons learned" during a recent trip to Baghdad; observed the predeployment training of forces; and extensively reviewed unclassified Pentagon documents, official and unofficial histories, troops' memoirs and blogs, and human rights reports. I have found not only that U.S. compliance with noncombatant immunity in Iraq is relatively high by historical standards but also that it has been improving since the beginning of the war.


Yes indeed, the first victim in war is the truth.

I mentioned that we are suffering from this false perception and that individual victories against fake stories are being swamped by the enemy's victories of shaping perceptions.

What we really need is a commission on how to shape war reporting and not about waging the war in Iraq. The former fight is the one that is truly grave and deteriorating.