Wednesday, December 28, 2005

Fake But Accurate: 1927 Edition

Sacco and Vanzetti were guilty, murdering, anarchist scum even though 25,000 Leftists marched to protest their executions at the time and even though they have remained martyrs for the Left ever since.

Upton Sinclair (via The Corner) said so (well, not three of my four descriptors):

Soon Sinclair would learn something that filled him with doubt. During his research for "Boston," Sinclair met with Fred Moore, the men's attorney, in a Denver motel room. Moore "sent me into a panic," Sinclair wrote in the typed letter that Hegness found at the auction a decade ago."

Alone in a hotel room with Fred, I begged him to tell me the full truth," Sinclair wrote. " … He then told me that the men were guilty, and he told me in every detail how he had framed a set of alibis for them."

His reasons for remaining silent when he knew the truth are probably very understandable to the likes of Dan Rather and certain New York Times writers:

Other letters tucked away in the Indiana archive illuminate why one of America's most strident truth tellers kept his reservations to himself."

My wife is absolutely certain that if I tell what I believe, I will be called a traitor to the movement and may not live to finish the book," Sinclair wrote Robert Minor, a confidant at the Socialist Daily Worker in New York, in 1927.

"Of course," he added, "the next big case may be a frame-up, and my telling the truth about the Sacco-Vanzetti case will make things harder for the victims.

"He also worried that revealing what he had been told would cost him readers. "It is much better copy as a naïve defense of Sacco and Vanzetti because this is what all my foreign readers expect, and they are 90% of my public," he wrote to Minor.

Pity Sinclair wouldn't speak truth to power.