Saturday, May 21, 2011

Not War-War

I'm no fan of the war powers act, since I think it is just a weaselly way for Congress to avoid having to exercise their own power of the purse to stop military actions initiated by the president that they think are wrong. Just automatically ending military action initiated by the president under his own powers as commander in chief is wrong, in my non-lawyer opinion.

But given how this law is a favorite of progressives, I am taking special delight in who is driving a stake into this undead thing:

In an effort to satisfy those arguing he needs to seek congressional authorization to continue US military activity in accordance with the War Powers Resolution, President Obama wrote a letter to congressional leaders this afternoon suggesting that the role is now so “limited” he does not need to seek congressional approval.

“Since April 4,” the president wrote, “U.S. participation has consisted of: (1) non-kinetic support to the NATO-led operation, including intelligence, logistical support, and search and rescue assistance; (2) aircraft that have assisted in the suppression and destruction of air defenses in support of the no-fly zone; and (3) since April 23, precision strikes by unmanned aerial vehicles against a limited set of clearly defined targets in support of the NATO-led coalition's efforts.”

And it is even funnier that the Obama administration's view on the act apparently changed over the last 60 days:

From the beginning of the U.S. military intervention in Libya, the Obama administration has cited the 1973 War Powers Act as the legal basis of its ability to conduct military activities for 60 days without first seeking a declaration of war from Congress. The military intervention started on March 19; Congress was notified on March 21. Those 60 days expire today.

Clearly, the administration thought they'd have this war wrapped up by now. But it isn't. So now it isn't a war-war.

Problem solved.