Tuesday, August 08, 2006

So What Happened While I Was Gone?

On July 26th I wondered if Iran's promise to "respond" to our nuclear offer could be more ominous than yet another refusal to cooperate. Could it be nuclear in nature?

Two days later I snapped out of it and said, nah, Iran is being too cautious in regard to Lebanon to be readying a nuclear response. Why show caution if you are about to go nuclear? The more chaos the better if that is your objective.

But today when I get home from vacation I hear speculation on TV about the possible significance of August 22nd.

So what has happened over the last week to make television shows wonder about the date and Iran's response?

UPDATE: Good Grief, Bernard Lewis (via Real Clear Politics) is wondering about Iran, August 22nd, and nukes. He doesn't say it is likely that we would see a nuclear "answer" to our demands--just that it bears watching:

What is the significance of Aug. 22? This year, Aug. 22 corresponds, in the Islamic calendar, to the 27th day of the month of Rajab of the year 1427. This, by tradition, is the night when many Muslims commemorate the night flight of the prophet Muhammad on the winged horse Buraq, first to "the farthest mosque," usually identified with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and back (c.f., Koran XVII.1). This might well be deemed an appropriate date for the apocalyptic ending of Israel and if necessary of the world. It is far from certain that Mr. Ahmadinejad plans any such cataclysmic events precisely for Aug. 22. But it would be wise to bear the possibility in mind.

A passage from the Ayatollah Khomeini, quoted in an 11th-grade Iranian schoolbook, is revealing. "I am decisively announcing to the whole world that if the world-devourers [i.e., the infidel powers] wish to stand against our religion, we will stand against their whole world and will not cease until the annihilation of all them. Either we all become free, or we will go to the greater freedom which is martyrdom. Either we shake one another's hands in joy at the victory of Islam in the world, or all of us will turn to eternal life and martyrdom. In both cases, victory and success are ours."

In this context, mutual assured destruction, the deterrent that worked so well during the Cold War, would have no meaning. At the end of time, there will be general destruction anyway. What will matter will be the final destination of the dead--hell for the infidels, and heaven for the believers. For people with this mindset, MAD is not a constraint; it is an inducement.


Now I'm worried again.

And even if there is nothing ominous about this August 22nd, how can we deter such whackjobs who believe that they win if they win and win if they die? If they get nuclear weapons, what stays their hand?

We have to take down Iran's mullahs. Soon.