I didn't really get any sense of why a land power like Russia is apparently trying so hard to build a navy from this article.
Other than some banal observations on the utility of naval power and actually sending ships to sea, I didn't learn why Russia wants a navy. With the question of whether Russia is trying to revive a blue water navy capable of acting far from Russia's shores, this seems important to know. But could Russia's renewed drive to build a navy really a function of Putin liking naval uniforms?
My view is that Russia needs smaller ships to protect their coasts; ballistic missile submarines as a survivable nuclear deterrent; forces to protect those subs; and down the line in importance, ships for show-the-flag missions abroad.
Otherwise, a fleet is a pointless drain on limited Russian resources when they need ground and air forces to protect their extremely long border.
Of course, in addition to the fleet there are two other traditional sources of Russian weakness.
Is Russia so used to facing aggressive threats from the west that they can't adjust to the new reality that unless Russia provokes it, no Western European countries want to spend money on military power to confront Russia?