An online journal of commentary, analysis, and dignified rants on national security issues. Other posts on home life, annoying things, and a vast 'other' are clearly marked.
I live and write in Ann Arbor, Michigan. University of Michigan AB and MA from Eastern Michigan University. One term in the Michigan Army National Guard. Former American history instructor and retired nonpartisan research analyst. I write on Blogger and Substack. Various military and private journals have published my occasional articles on military subjects. See "My Published Works" on the TDR web version or under the mobile version drop-down menu for citations and links.
The year 2020 will be a good year when I look back on it.
The year 2020 has been for me one with problems that predated the Xi Jinping Flu pandemic. But those problems are being addressed if not resolved. The pandemic itself has not created any new problems that won't pass with the end of the pandemic. And there has been good that as the years pass will overwhelm the bad and define this year for me.
One part of my view is that problems could have been way worse if the pandemic had hit in the previous years. Or even a year later. So I had that going for me.
So the bad has been contained for now. There have also been a number of good and neutral things this year. And one good thing will be what defines the year: My daughter graduated from high school and began college. And she was admitted under the pre-pandemic standards before they seemed to decline across the education world in response to the pandemic. So nobody will ever be able to say she got into her university on anything less than her qualifications.
Sure, there is much that is out of my hands. Voters vote, politicians act, and overseas friends, foes, and enemies act in ways I don't want them to. I don't like those things. Some annoy me and some infuriate me. But those things don't define my personal life. I influence what I can and cope with what I cannot influence.
So yeah, 2020 will be a good year despite this once-in-a-century pandemic. I really am a glass half full kind of man, aren't I?
I know that many people have endured much, whether from the pandemic or from the reaction to the pandemic--both justified and unjustified reactions. So I don't dismiss the losses that many people have endured and that will take time to grieve and overcome.
But while I can already foresee viewing his year positively, my hope for those who have endured much will with the passage of more time be able to look back on 2020 and say that it was a good year. Whether in the balance or because of what you did to overcome the problems of 2020 that helped you for the rest of your life.
Hezbolah is boasting of its loyalty to Iran and ability to hit Israel and determination to hit American targets. Explain to me again why that would not invite an American-backed Israeli campaign to shred Hezbollah?
The Lebanese terrorist group Hizbollah has doubled its arsenal of
precision-guided missiles in the past year, its leader has claimed,
despite Israel’s efforts to stop it acquiring more weapons.
Hassan
Nasrallah, the group’s leader, said he had the capability to strike
anywhere in Israel and occupied Palestinian territories using the
missiles, which the Iran-backed group has threatened to use against
targets such as oil refineries, air force bases and the Israeli
military’s headquarters in Tel Aviv.
In a televised interview,
Nasrallah said that Hizbollah would retaliate to any attacks on its
strongholds in Lebanon, while the group is also seeking to avenge the
killing of two of its members in an Israeli air strike in Syria in
August.
He
also repeated a vow to take revenge for the killing of the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard Corps commander, Qassim Soleimani, by an American
drone strike in Iraq on January 3 last year.
Does Israel go in to occupy the rocket-launching sites shortly after the new year to avoid immediate Biden retaliation? I've been expecting this for some time, but Israel knows that Biden will not be friendly to Israel and may be hostile the way Obama was.
I mean, as long as Hezbollah is telegraphing its intent to hit Israel and America, why wouldn't Trump green light and bolster an Israeli military mission to tear up Iran's vassal force Hezbollah before Biden can marshal full punishment of Israel for getting in the way of Glorious Iran Reset 2.0?
Wouldn't America's armada in the region, which includes a cruise missile sub, a carrier, and a light carrier, plus aircraft--and Israel's nuclear-capable submarine--be a warning to Iran to sit and take it or experience worse than the loss of their Hezbollah proxy?
U.S.-backed forces are carrying out new raids against militants
affiliated with the Islamic State (IS) terror group in eastern Syria.
The new campaign led by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) targets remnants of IS in Deir al-Zour province, which borders Iraq.
The SDF, a Kurdish-led military alliance, said its ongoing operations
have been focused on active IS cells in the northern part of the
province.
“On December 26, our Special Forces and International Coalition Forces arrested a member of a terrorist cell north of Deir al-Zour, during a joint raid operation,” the SDF said in a statement Sunday.
We aren't abandoning the Syrian Kurds. We are abandoning the Kurds' goal
to hold the border region which anti-Turkish Kurds need to fight
Turkey.
We've been trying to protect the Kurds in that border area but we've run
out of stalling tactics. The Turks were coming in and we could fight
the Turks or get out of the way. What should we have done under those
circumstances?
This is bad. I don't like siding with Erdogan over the Syrian Kurds. I don't deny that. But it could be worse.
This author thinks that the Brexit trade deal does in fact restore British sovereignty. But he points out a rather insulting provision that the European Union put in to jab Britain. I think this might be a useful tool for Britain against the EU.
While the deal has provisions that appear to let the EU hang on to influence over British law, in practice the provisions are toothless.
There are sections [Law Other 137, for example] involving ultimately
pointless chest beating over the ECHR, fundamental freedoms and the rule
of law. Pointless because these clauses will never be violated: neither
the EU or UK are rogue states. We are friends, allies and equivalent
partners trying to uphold democracy. The pantomime suggestions the UK
would go rogue were, unhelpful, at best.
If the EU people put this in to jab Britain by implying Britain could be a rogue threat to the peace and happiness that the EU is supposedly building, it might be a double-edged sword that can be used when the proto-imperial EU sheds that prefix and goes rogue.
Europe without American help has the economic, demographic, and
scientific base to keep a weakened Russia out of Europe. But if left on
its own, Europe's long history of autocracy will return and risk a
Europe that again poses a threat to America.
The unofficial reason for NATO after World War II was to "keep American
in (Europe--unlike after World War I), keep the Russians (Soviets) out
(of Western Europe, after the Soviets advance to the Elbe River), and
keep Germany down (after starting two world wars)."
The modern purpose of NATO is to keep America in Europe, keep Russia
out, and keep European autocratic impulses down. The third reason is a
real threat that is easy to forget in the post-World War II time frame
that we remember as the normal state of European affairs. And the first
reason is the means to achieve the third.
That post is a reminder--one that I needed when I first ran across another author who mentioned it, and I said to myself in a blinding flash of the bloody obvious that I hadn't really thought about, "Well duh"--that the modern democratic Europe was built by America's presence in NATO after World War II and the expansion after winning the Cold War. Prior to 1945, Europe was not the beacon of democratic freedom without that ugly "American" military might thinking that the Europeans claim to be today.
So Britain, which does have a long history of democracy and freedom, is not a potential rogue state.
But the EU, with its host of member states with rather thin resumes' of real democracy, is not the bastion of rogue-free governance that it annoyingly claims to be.
Without NATO and America, rule of law will slip away in Europe as brute force is increasingly used on the people of Europe to keep them in line; and the EU will shift to open hostility to America.
America needs to remain involved in NATO while keeping NATO strong as an institution to prevent Europe from being controlled by a hostile government that can mobilize its still vast demographic, scientific, and economic potential to be a real military threat.
Iraq was hoping the IMF
(International Monetary Fund) would help bail the government out of
its growing budget deficit crises. An IMF audit team completed a ten-day
examination of the economic situation on December 10th and
reported that Iraq has the same problems it had for several years, only
worse and that the solution was not more multi-billion-dollar loans but
internal reforms that address the widespread corruption. Earlier audits
had found that corrupt officials were responsible for $400 billion of
government funds stolen or misappropriated since 2003.
Note that the
corrupt Saddam-era bureaucracy of 2 million has expanded under majority
Shia rule to 6 million. So the corruption just expanded to benefit the
majority rather than just the minority.
The bright side is that Saudi
Arabia is finally competing with Iran for the friendship of the Arab
Shia in Iraq. Although without rule of law Saudi money will just fuel corruption.
Still, with Iran selling methamphetamine to Iraq you'd think Iran's
appeal would tarnish faster than it already has.
I appreciate his effort on Vietnam given my repeated efforts to get people to recognize that America won the Iraq War. But judging Vietnam is complicated.
This is a worthy effort:
The United States sent 2.7 million men and women to South Vietnam to
help preserve the Democratic Government of that nation. Nearly sixty
thousand were killed and/or missing in action. Ignoring the truth
concerning winning of that War is disrespectful and a slap in the face
of those who served and a disgraceful epitaph to those who were killed
and those still missing in action.
For about ten years I have been
trying to get this Nation to acknowledge the fact that the United
States military won the Vietnam War.
It is a worthy effort because Vietnam veterans went to war and did their duty yet were denied a recognition of their honorable effort even if in the end the country we defended was defeated and destroyed.
But it isn't as simple as convincing people America won the war.
One, it is true that South Vietnam stood when we pulled our troops out. So technically we won the war we were in. And I have great sympathy for that military-centric view. Our military did defeat enemies and build up local allies to hold when we left.
But America fights wars and not the military. So the failure of Congress to allow America to support South Vietnam with supplies or fire support meant that America failed to secure the battlefield victory. Are we really going to rest a debate over victory on whether we truly had a "decent interval" between leaving South Vietnam and the fall of South Vietnam?
Two, victory also depends on the level you look at. Was it the Vietnam War that is judged on its outcome narrowly? Or was it the Vietnam campaign in the Cold War against the USSR and communism in general?
Even if you think America lost the Vietnam campaign, I think the fight there helped win the Cold War. When America first entered the fight, the region from India to Southeast Asia was weak and vulnerable to communist subversion. The decade America bought for those countries by holding the line in South Vietnam probably kept them in the Free World. The dominoes that fell after South Vietnam were limited to Laos and Cambodia. In 1965, the repercussions could have gone all the way to India.
Further, the willingness of America to lose 60,000 troops in defense of South Vietnam had to have an effect on deterring the Soviets from attacking the far more important NATO Europe. What would we do to hold Europe if we were willing to lose 60,000 in South Vietnam?
My guess is that if the Army had been ordered to withdraw as units instead of shuffling units which destroyed unit cohesion in order to send the longest-serving troops home first that Vietnam would not be seen as a defeat of the Army.
And four, given this self-inflicted it is somewhat dangerous to speak of Congress losing the war that the military won. I don't want the Army to develop a "stabbed in the back" attitude toward civilian leadership.
Fortunately, the battlefield successes in the Long War, including the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns that did not involve wrecking the military in the process, has--along with 45 years of distance--moved the military beyond that old potentially festering wound of Vietnam. I think we can safely admit that America lost the Vietnam campaign when a conventional North Vietnamese Army conquered South Vietnam despite the earlier battlefield victory over the Viet Cong insurgency and their NVA friends/masters (and yes, it was a blend of insurgency and conventional warfare despite the shorthand) which failed to hold the support of enough people in South Vietnam to overthrow the Saigon government.
The fact that dictators once again sit on the thrones of the Middle East
is far from evidence that the [Arab Spring] uprisings failed. Democracy was only one
part of the protesters’ demands. The movement was engaged in a
generations-long struggle that rejected a regional order that had
delivered nothing but corruption, disastrous governance, and economic
failure. By that standard, the uprisings have profoundly reshaped every
conceivable dimension of Arab politics, including individual attitudes,
political systems, ideologies, and international relations.
Greece's acquisition of the F-35, combined with its existing force of
over a hundred F-16 fighters, will make it a bulwark of the alliance’s
southern flank.
As a result of Turkey's fall from favor, Greece is an increasingly
appealing candidate to step in. It has one of the largest NATO airbases
in Europe and has long hosted the F-35s of other countries. Iraklion Air
Base in Crete is now being eyed by the U.S. as a candidate to replace
Incirlik. The rest of Europe also appears favorably disposed to Greece.
Victor Hanson thoughts on the incoming Biden administration. We really can't afford to have Biden meet foreign leaders in person. Better to have them suspect he is in cognitive decline than have them confirm it first hand. I was going to write that this will be hard to pull off for four years, but we all know it won't have to be that long. Biden should have a personal protection detail composed of Iranian, Chinese, and Russian nationals. Lord knows they will defend Biden to the death for the sake of their motherlands.
Of course progressives are least likely to take pride in America. And when they do, it is usually only when progressives are running the country. Which means they take pride in progressives and not America. I don't understand how anybody isn't proud of America.
Oh good, despite the fact that Trump was just more vocal than Obama in insisting Germany pay for its defense (the 2% NATO standard was agreed to in the Obama era) the coming Biden administration is letting the Euro-weenies stand up and take pride in being Euro-weenies. Instead, Germany should abandon all guilt about being a defense free rider and focus on (cheaper) cyber warfare expertise. As if Germany would lead any type of counter-attack. Hah! I'm close to being fed up with the Germans.
The Army awarded a contract to update the Abrams tank over the next eight years: "The Abrams M1A2 SEPV3, described as the most reliable of the Abrams
family, is a version of the current SEPV2 production model with
significant improvements in the areas of survivability, maintainability,
and network capability, General Dynamics said." And improved ammunition flexibility.
I assume the Tyranny Porn aficionados will turn their attention to a daily 2-minute hate against Trump supporters to stoke their baseless obsession when Trump oddly doesn't stage a coup to remain in power.
A reminder that "science" changes on a dime for non-scientific reasons. I was always pro-mask even when we were being told not to use medical-grade masks. It was clear by listening to them closely that they were not saying masks are ineffective but that medical staff needed the scarce items more.
I'm not upset that members of Congress are "line cutting" to get the Xi Jinping Flu vaccine first. First of all, 538 shots are not going to deprive anybody lower down a vaccine. That's a drop in the bucket, an it is important for our federal legislative body to be able to work together. Second, can you imagine if they did not get it first and were accused of using the rest of America as test subjects to make sure it is safe for them to get the vaccine later? You'll have better chances to trigger my outrage if higher income Americans in general get the vaccine first, including professional athletes and actors. And I'm going to admit that I'm experiencing whiplash from the left saying that they will never trust the "Trump" vaccine to overnight saying minorities should have vaccination priority. Whoa.
Biden will respond "in kind" to Russia's SolarWinds hack? Why do we assume we are not now? And what credibility does he have for that statement when the Obama-Biden administration launched its "reset" with Russia in 2009 despite Russia's invasion of Georgia in 2008?
UAV's disguised as birds. It will be interesting to see what countries start shooting birds routinely out of sheer paranoia.
The chutzpah is breathtaking. Given Swalwell's record and high profile over the past four years, his downfall will be well deserved and glorious to behold. Will Pelosi and the media back him despite the last four years of hyperventilating over imaginary Russian collusion?
The pandemic relief bill is not actually only a covid relief bill. It is a combination covid relief bill and "normal" omnibus appropriations bill. So the crap in the spending bill is the usual crap that gets into spending bills. By all means be upset with that enduring problem. But the the relief portion is smaller than the Democrats wanted it to be--stuffed with partisan junk disguised as relief. So I'm not sure why conservatives are complaining about this spending bill. I think opening up the economy rather than spending money is the answer on the covid issue. But the short-term relief spending could be worse--and will be if we wait until next year. And conservatives should be worried that Democrats are celebrating Trump's desire for bigger relief checks. Trump earned conservative support with a number of conservative policies that rejected his liberal history. He certainly earned my support because of the last four years despite my longstanding personal distaste for him. If Trump is returning to his liberal populist instincts, conservatives should be wary of embracing every Trump priority. The spending is just insane.
A tour around Israel: a reminder that a Biden reset with Iran will allow Iran to fund Hamas and Fatah which have been cut off from major Arab funding because the Arabs are sick of the Palestinian attitudes; and Iran is moving the Houthi offensive effort to the Red Sea to attack shipping (perhaps the Israeli sub sent toward Iran is related to this?). One of those mines scored a hit.
I have as little respect for conservatives spouting off about secession as I did about leftists spouting off about secession after 2016. I think it is all venting. Which is fine. Restoring federalism would be a soft-secession that we should all want to reduce polarization at the national level.
Have Xi Jinping Flu deaths in America been inflated by 13%? I've long said we are over-counting with a monetary incentive to count deaths with covid19 as deaths because of covid19. I dismissed claims that say the overwhelming majority of deaths are not from the pandemic. So this estimate at least seems reasonable. I imagine this will be corrected the day after Biden is sworn in so it looks like he lowered deaths. And again, wait to compare country or state efforts until this is over and when we have uniform definitions for the purpose of comparison.
I'm really getting annoyed at those meal delivery kits with very well off young people starting off saying how they like to eat "healthy." They have a fantastic kitchen larger than my living area and they decided that they have to buy expensive mail-order food ingredients to eat "healthy." Yeah, nobody could do that before companies started marketing expensive mail-order kits to yuppies. I wish these people would just admit that they like to eat "expensively" in a way that advertises their wealth and moral superiority to everybody who knows them.
"Nearly 60 percent of the country thinks poorly of Progressive darling Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and 75 percent want nothing to do with the socialism she preaches." That's a pretty good result given that a pretty face is making the case for socialism. Although I'd be happier if it was all people and not just likely voters.Although maybe I'm assuming wrongly that all people would be more favorable to both. I guess I'll just be happy that people who vote reject both. Never forget the failure of socialism as this Soviet-era joke highlights: A man orders a car and is informed that the car will be available in two years. The man, unfazed, asks whether it will be there in the morning or the afternoon. The man taking the order is stunned and asks how it could possibly matter whether the car that will be available in two years will be there in the afternoon or morning! The man replies that he has a washing machine repairman coming in the afternoon. That is socialism.
For anyone eager for a reckoning on the future direction of America by means of violence if necessary, I recommend a look at post-World War II Europe, which I note in this post. Violence destroys a lot if you want a decisive decision. Let's use evolution rather than revolution to determine our direction.
Let's not think there isn't a bright side to the pandemic lock downs: "During the quarter ending in September, when the overall unemployment
rate averaged 8.5 percent, 52 percent of actors, 55 percent of dancers
and 27 percent of musicians were out of work, according to the National
Endowment for the Arts." Hey, they voted for the people ordering the lock downs. Let's just hope it is 100% for mimes. Again, Instapundit.
The contrast is unmistakable. On the one hand, there is the
supposedly incompetent Trump administration, which will provide vaccines
to 20 million Americans in the next two to three weeks alone. By the
end of March, the plan is for around 100 million Americans to have
received the two vaccine injections they need.
On the
other hand,
there is the supposedly well-prepared Europeans, who continue to have to
wait for a vaccine that was developed in Germany. And who still don’t
know exactly how much of the vaccine they will be getting in the coming
months."
I guess the template for coverage has been wrong for nine months.
But no worries, we'll probably out-produce our estimates and be able to
help out in Europe.
When you check the definitions section, I'm sure you'll find "incompetent" defined as "not a Democrat."
And pity this nuance didn't make it into the news prior to our presidential election.
Merry Christmas! I think I'll take tomorrow off blogging. I don't know if I've done that.
Quite possibly that could have happened in 2002 when I first started blogging. Or maybe I've done this a lot over the years and just don't remember. I know I've blogged on things I forgot I blogged on earlier, and found my reasoning and conclusion were virtually identical.
I hope you are celebrating as well as you can under the circumstances. The joy of the season should be embraced in difficult times as best you can to salvage good from the bad. I put up my decorations and lights the day after Thanksgiving as God and tradition demand.
I also did not let the Xi Jinping Flu pandemic drag me down and fail to send out Christmas cards this year, figuring that day drinking is an acceptable coping mechanism.
Opposable thumbs and mindless adherence to tradition are what separate us from the beasts, after all.
And if your work place doesn't allow you to cite even a heavily secularized Christian holiday, wish people a Merry C.H.R.I.S.T.M.A.S. instead.
Over the last few years more European governments have come to realize
that integration of their recent Moslem migrants into the local culture
is an essential process for preventing Islamic terrorism. That means
some nations are making it mandatory to learn the local language and
customs. Another lesson learned is the importance of preventing
unintegrated Moslem migrants from congregating in Moslem majority
neighborhoods. That enables radical Islamic clerics to establish mosques
where all the members are dedicated to, or supportive of Islamic
terrorism as a means of “defending Islam.”
France is not alone in its sudden resolve to fight that radicalization, apparently. And in the rest of the post that I quoted, you can see hope from America's experience that the European effort is not futile.
The Long War might actually end with Western and moderate (and modernized) Moslem victory rather than peter out from jihadi exhaustion, large body counts of more conveniently vulnerable non-Islamist or insufficiently Islamist Moslems at the hands of jihadis, and battlefield losses--only to reignite in a generation or two, this time with nuclear weapons in the jihadi arsenal.
Rep. Thomas Suozzi’s message to the (likely) soon-to-be departing
financial firm Goldman Sachs had the sound of an 80s love ballad: don’t
go, baby.
“Please don’t leave us,” the New York congressman said on CNBC following
news that the multibillion-dollar investment bank is likely to bolt New York City for Florida. “We’re in a desperate time in New York right now. We need you. You’re important to us. We want you to stay.”
There really is a song for this. But an older one that has attracted a Twitter cancel mob is more appropriate.
Baby, It's Broke Outside
[Verse 1: Goldman Sachs & Rep. Suozzi] I really can't stay (But, baby, it's broke outside) I've got to get away (But, baby, it's broke outside) This city has been (Been hoping that you'd drop in) So like a heist (I'll hold your cash, it's just so nice) My shareholders start to worry (Tax cow, what's your hurry?) My CEO's pacing the floor (Listen to the protesters roar) So, city, I'd better scurry (Tax cow, please don't hurry) But maybe just a half a riot more (Hire some guards at your door) The clients might think (Baby, it's bad down there) Say, what's with this fee? (No Broadway to find down there) I wish I knew how (Your revenue's like starlight now) To break this Hell (I'll take your cash, your mayor looks swell) I ought to say, "No safety at all" (Mind if I squeeze you harder?) At least I'm gonna say that I cried (What's the sense of hurtin' my budget?)
[Verse 2: Goldman Sachs & Rep. Suozzi] I simply must go (But, baby, it's broke outside) The answer is no (But, baby, it's broke outside) Your arson has been (How lucky FDNY dropped in) So nice and woke (Look out to sea at the storms) My CFO is suspicious (Gosh your profits look delicious) My brokers will be there at the door (knaves upon the five-borough shore) The SEC's mind is vicious (Gosh your profits are delicious) But maybe just a tax credit more (Never such a deficit before) I've gotta get out (But, baby, you'd burn down there) Say, extend me a credit (It's just killer bees down there) I've already been banned (I thrill when you fill my coffers) But don't you see? (How can you do this thing to me?) There's bound to be riots tomorrow (Think of my budgetary sorrow) At least there will be plenty of space (If you find a Florida Man and die)
Baby it's broke outside. The company needs to run before New York legislates an exit tax.
Withdrawing most of our troops from the Middle East isn't a retreat. America can afford to reduce troop strength if we don't just ignore the region and hope for the best.
The recent assassination of Iranian physicist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh
may not have been an American-led operation, but it nonetheless raised
the risk of reprisal attacks, quite possibly targeting U.S. bases. The
vulnerability of American military bases in the Middle East to missile
attack is not new, but growing Iranian capabilities make U.S. assets
deployed in the region more vulnerable. In recognition of this threat, a
rethink of U.S. basing architecture is needed.
What I am most interested in is the reminder that prior to the
Iran-Iraq War when we added force to protect oil exports, America's
military presence in the Persian Gulf region was minimal.
So as time went on, the need for American military power in the region
went up. Our peak commitments in Iraq reached about 180,000 while in
Afghanistan it reached 100,000.
And don't forget that the collapse of the Soviet Union and the
still-future Chinese military rise allowed America to commit force to
the region without risking higher priority theaters.
Still, we eventually beat this Iran/al Qaeda effort in Iraq. And even
our surge in Afghanistan left Afghan forces that could carry on the
fight. In Iraq War 2.0 against ISIL and in current Afghanistan, we can
see that we don't need 100,000+ troops in direct combat. Locals with our
support and special forces can carry on the day-to-day fighting.
So it is possible for America to reduce our combat role and rely on
local allies and on our proven ability to rapidly deploy forces if they
are needed. The problem is that in the visuals the world has gotten used
to seeing a lot of American forces in combat as a concrete
demonstration of our commitment.
But a reduction in our military power doesn't mean our commitment is
lower. It means the need for our military power in the region to back
our commitment is going down after spiking from about 1973 to 2009
(although the surges in Afghanistan extended that to 2011 or so).
Eventually locals will get used to our lower footprint and lower level
of direct combat without thinking it means less commitment.
A number of events prompted the dispatch of American troops to watch
and fight enemies, including the fall of the Shah of Iran who America
armed to be our local "policeman" to keep the Gulf quiet. Replacing that
Iran with the mullah-run "Death to America!" Iran was a major flip.
Our
wars and diplomatic efforts since then allow America to reduce troop
strength and lower our military actions since the peak need for American
troops.
My only worry is that we assume the relative stability that allows our draw down wasn't achieved by the troops we think we don't need. Our military power and activity can't go to zero any time soon unless we want to risk the relative stability we have achieved. Withdraw--but verify the freedom to do that.
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army may have set a new goal of ensuring
military power equivalent to that of U.S. forces in Asia’s western
Pacific region by 2027, sources close to the matter have said.
That's a tilted comparison. The entire PLA versus just American forces in the western Pacific.
And the Chinese objective doesn't include friends and allies in the region--which America has a lot of while China has (if you squint in a dark room) three. And probably zero if you count those who'd be willing to fight America at China's side.
The plan will see the armed forces grow from the current 55,000
positions to 90,000 by 2030. Several disbanded regiments will be
reestablished and the number of conscripts will increase to 8,000
annually, which is a doubling compared with 2019. The Navy will receive
new equipment, including a fifth submarine, and upgrades in armaments.
Russia is weak enough compared to the USSR that small bordering states are motivated by Russian hostility to arm up rather than submit to Moscow's domination.
Which will make them a prize for NATO to get rather than being a burden.
Russia caused a major stir earlier this month when it deployed one of
its most advanced air defense systems, the S-300V4, on a disputed
northern island claimed by Japan.
This was no isolated incident:
For several years now, Moscow has been on a mission to strengthen its
military presence in Northeast Asia. To counter the U.S., Russia has
upgraded its weaponry in its Far East, commissioned new ships for its
Pacific Fleet, and significantly expanded military cooperation with
China.
If Russia is so worried about America and NATO, why would Russia move forces away from the heart of European Russia? Doesn't preparing for a virtually non-existent American-Japanese threat to the Russian Far East make Russia's western border--which the Russians bizzarely claim is under threat from NATO--easier to overrun?
Between the FBI’s deception of the surveillance court and Mueller’s
weaponization of FARA laws, the federal government’s most powerful
institutions turned against an elected president to discredit him, as a
“check on his power,” to use Weissmann’s phrase. The dynamic of a
rage-filled lying president and a dogged national-security bureaucracy
set on taking him down has advanced Russia’s strategic goal of tearing
our republic apart. Both sides should acknowledge their guilt as we move
past a president who was both framed and guilty.[*]
The Russians played an epic supporting role in this tragedy.
But it is our fault that we magnify Russia's assholery to
levels the Russians can only marvel at enjoying. Nobody comes out
looking good over the last 4-1/2 years, including Trump's 2018 Helsinki
performance. That momentarily surpassed my anger reflex over the sudden faux 2016 Democratic outrage over Russia.
We'll see if that outrage can survive the defeat of Trump or whether a
smiling Original Reset 2.0 at the expense of allies will beckon.
But the
behavior of our permanent bureaucracy by taking sides--hard--in the
partisan fight has brought shame to our government. The use of the
dormant Foreign Agents Registration Act to target Trump people was shameful.
The Democrats acted shamefully, but they are partisans driven mad by
Trump. The same with the media.
But the bureaucracy is supposed to act
for the country regardless of who they think should have won. That ideal is
bent routinely, but with Trump too many did not even try to pretend to
be civil servants rather than partisans with job security. And they got
away with it. I could not ever imagine acting that way when I was a
nonpartisan staff of the state legislature.
In the end, our own institutions
discredited American democracy and governance far more successfully
than any Russian disinformation campaign could have. As I wise man once said, we have met the enemy. And they is us.
*"Guilty" of being the Trump we've long known and not of any crimes, of
course. So that word usage is unfortunate. And Trump had reason to have
even more rage than he unfortunately started with. But do read it all.
I have a long history of not liking Trump. As I've said, I long thought
of him as a liberal Democrat. But the absolute insanity and criminality
of the 24/7 turn-it-to-11 Resistance that amplified Russia's
effort to damage America also pushed Trump to the right; and in the face of the relentless insane opposition raised my opinion
of Trump a great deal over the odious alternative. The relentless Resistance pushed me to defend Trump out of a sense of fairness even aside from pure policy considerations (which is a mostly positive but mixed bag as far as I'm concerned--and definitely superior to what Clinton would have provided).
The Saudi coalition continues to grind away at Iran-supported Houthi control in Yemen, while the Saudi air defenses have gotten better at stopping missiles and drones. So the Iranians are going back to hitting ships in the Red Sea. This is one more problem that will be made worse if Biden tries a Reset 2.0 with Iran's mullah regime.
I have no doubt that as they long have, foreigners interfered in the 2020 election. Just as I have no doubt that they--including the Russians--interfered in 2016. The question is whether they had any effect. The bigger question is whether they actually hacked election results or committed fraud. In 2016 there was no indication of those more important questions. I suspect the same is true today.
Democrats want to steal from the blue collar class and give that money to the children of the upper classes. And it angers beyond reason people like me who borrowed little for college and saved money for my children's college rather than blow the money on vacations and stuff while pleading poverty "for the children." To Hell with these people. If Democrats truly want to help poor people, cancel some of the debt of people who never finished a degree. Let the people who got MAs in victims studies enjoy their loan payments. Tip to Instapundit.
The covid19 panic: "So far covid19 has caused deaths per million population in the U.S. similar to the annual flu did in 1957-58 and 1968-69. " I'm skeptical that China will benefit from the Xi Jinping Flu pandemic given the panic that has overtaken the world over this and the harm Western countries have inflicted on themselves to fight it.
The question of whether the Navy is falling behind the PLAN is interesting.
But I prefer to balance this as a question of our entire military
versus their entire military. Purple, don't you know? Plus, you have to
consider that most of the American fleet is not in the western Pacific
while most of the PLAN is in or adjacent to China. And America has
allies with powerful naval and air power. My view is that the Chinese
have an initial edge in a war because they set the timing which allows
them to maximize their fleet operations against a fraction of the
American navy. Then America mobilizes and deploys while allies activate
as well. China has a dilemma of whether to also target American allies
in the opening days of war and guarantee these allies fight with America
very quickly or gamble on allies staying out of the fight if left
alone--but being stronger if they join the fight.
Republicans failed to prove election fraud sufficient to change the election despite early claims that it would be forthcoming. I'm disappointed in the claim-proof gulf. The gulf is smaller in distance and duration than the claims of proof for Russia-Trump 2016 collusion, but it is still a fatal gulf. So if
Republicans spend four years stridently claiming that the prior
election was invalid I think Republicans can safely say they learned it
by watching Democrats:
Sometimes I think the main reason for using the legal system to battle the Biden win because it may have been helped by ample opportunities for fraud and engineered error--magnified by ridiculous Orange Hitler propaganda--is to inspire the troops for future battles to contain the damage the Biden administration can do. The current perfectly lawful under our Constitution legal system battles--like this one on alternate Electors--are long-shots and highly unlikely to work. But you can't turn enthusiasm off and on like a switch. But as I noted above, Republicans learned that by watching the Democrats. Tips to Instapundit.
Biden has gotten his Electoral College votes. He is officially the president-elect. Republicans failed to prove election-changing fraud. That may be because of the short time to prove it. But here we are. There are levers of power apart from the presidency. This is still a republic with substantial powers away from the center and outside of government. Republicans need to organize them to resist the incoming administration. And part of the resistance is reforming voting to remove the avenues for cheating and engineered error (error that can be "fixed" in a partisan manner with no oversight). Work the problem. Beginning with the Georgia runoffs for the Senate. Working the problem is harder without the Senate. Leave the futile and stupid gestures to the other side:
Trump has been carrying out a lot of freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea to deny Chinese claims of sovereignty over the vast majority of that body of water. Will Biden return to the Obama era phony FONOPs that I began to suspect were taking place?
Well this thought from a three-star Air Force general is just silly. Or does the Air Force think it can operate its air bases without the Army between them and enemy ground troops? And it is a dangerous issue for the Air Force to raise. Does he really think the Army wouldn't jump at the chance to take the job and money that the Air Force gets for Army close air support and put it in-house as it was before the Air Force was promoted from Army control after World War II?
When the Russians (in their Soviet era) were on the Elbe River, a missile launch false alarm like this would have been very dangerous. Now? Not so much, I think.
I think the people giving credit to the European Union for trade and stability benefits are mistakenly crediting the EU for benefits that the European Economic Community provided.
If I'm ever asked to state my pronouns, they will be "ho, hum, huh?" Peak Stupid will cross the boundary into space at the pace we are raising it.
The former senior intelligence officials misled Americans about the Biden "laptop" corruption scandal. It was clear at the time that they were lying by wording ("has all the hallmarks of") that the media willfully interpreted in a way friendly to Biden--that Russia did it. Basically the intel people said that if the Russians did it, it might look like this. Which isn't the same as saying Russia did it. One could say it had the hallmarks of any other country's intelligence outfit--or even that it had the hallmarks of the truth.
I suppose it is barely possible that President Elect Biden won't be sworn in as president if evidence of fraud is strong enough to shame even the Pelosi-run House into declining to accept the formal Electoral College vote. Long shot on that kind of evidence and for Pelosi doing the right thing. Absent that, it's time to work the problem of containing Biden. And that includes winning control of the Senate next month. Don't let pursuit of the unlikely perfect wreck achievement of the good within reach.
I agree. I was totally against the militarization of police until the police had to face sustained rioting this year.
I know Trump and his most loyal backers are slamming Senator McConnell for urging Republicans to accept the validity of Biden's election (which isn't, obviously, the same as supporting Biden's agenda). But perhaps McConnell is worried that Republicans might not hold the Senate next year and needs open lines of communication to prevent the Democrats from killing the filibuster if they run the Senate. Heck, there might even be a secret deal. Sheer speculation. But sometimes you have to fall back and preserve power rather than hold the line at all costs and risk crippling losses in order to win the war. And Trump had five weeks to produce something more substantial than he did. Fewer than 50,000 votes shifted would have made Trump the winner. But he did not provide the proof to shift those votes. It was a short time frame, to be sure. But he got that time with Republican support despite Democratic/media hysteria. And really, the most effective voting interference might have been the relentless media Orange Hitler propaganda over the last four years that swayed too many people to vote for Ham Sandwich (D) for president. I just hope we haven't gotten what we deserve--good and hard.
Hillary Clinton started the BS Trump-Russia collusion hoax that polarized our country the last four years. And the Obama administration was worried that the Russians were manipulating the Clinton campaign to do this! So I don't want to hear a damn thing about how Trump supporters haven't accepted Biden as the president yet--when he isn't even the president yet. And as long as we're going back in time, you're damned right Clinton should have served time for her private email system that evaded government security and record retention rules and practices. Is our only hope for some justice over the last 4-1/2 years more declassification?
I assume I am low on the list for the Xi Jinping Flu vaccine. For yucks I tried a covid19 risk calculator I found online. I have no idea how credible it is. So I'm not linking to it. But online searching at a basic level is not hard. Over the next year under weak mitigation measures and no lockdown conditions, I have under a 4% chance of being hospitalized and a 0.08% chance of dying. I'll still take the vaccine when available, of course. For the team. And I assume that the odds are calculated without considering that the virus will be defeated in less than a year. My odds are lower than calculated both because of mitigation efforts I take regardless of rules and because the odds don't need to be calculated over a year.
Not to be rude--and, like my stand against bowing to royalty, not like
I'll have the chance--but I'd call Jill Biden "Elliot" before I call her
"doctor." And honestly, I mistakenly had a higher opinion of her degree until I heard more about what it is and her path to it, in particular. The Streisand Effect Exposure Corollary?
Barring extraordinary revelations and evidence, Biden will be inaugurated. Which is a shame. But violence (by a few, I'll add; and not yet anywhere near the left-wing violence we've experienced this year, and indeed for the last four years off and on) is not the proper response to the possibility that fraud is the cause of Biden's win. Without clear proof rather than data analysis of odd outcomes or sworn testimony of what people believe happened, we have to go forward. As I mentioned, if proof does come up in the future, I imagine impeachment is the legal measure to correct the crime. Which doesn't help Trump. But justice is not perfect. And America should always have gratitude to Trump not only for many policies and judicial appointments, but for denying Hillary Clinton the presidency. He'll always have that credit. And honestly, Biden's victory just rubs Clinton's nose in her 2016 failure. She'll always know that Joe (Ham Sandwich (D)) Biden managed to do what she could not. That's gonna leave a mark. Invest your money in boxed wine stocks now.
California wants to release rapists and murderers from prison because of the pandemic? Huh? I thought California was locking up the non-criminals because of the pandemic? Does California hate criminals so much that it would release criminals to what is supposed to be a death sentence outside? I salute the sheriff for his compassionate decision not to effectively kill those convicts by releasing them. And Californians are haters too. They need to get with the program. It is way better to be raped or killed than to risk even one prisoner's life to the low odds of getting or dying from the virus. Haters.
Look, the non-wealthy nations had a choice when the Chinese Communist Party unleashed the pandemic on the world: Be further down the line for getting the Xi Jinping Flu vaccine after the wealthy countries that design and produce it use it on their own people; or don't get any at all by preventing the wealthy countries from designing and producing the vaccine. So just stop this self-flagellating nonsense. Anybody that upset in a wealthy country can simply refuse to get the vaccine until the last herder in northern Chad get it, if it makes them feel morally superior.
Just because Trump will be out of office doesn't mean Twitter won't be a presidential election and governing tool. We had advances to radio, broadcast television, cable TV, YouTube shows, and now Twitter and other social media. Nobody goes backwards. I assume the next presidential election has video game advertising. Or did I miss that this year?
Giving Swalwell a pass on his relationship with a Chinese spy because he personally didn't tell her anything classified ignores the possibility that she gained information just by having access to him. Did he have no files she could photograph? Did she meet someone through him more vulnerable to espionage? Did she find out about any meetings that other Chinese spies could gain access to in order to get classified information? Even if she was just one of a "thousand grains of sand" Swalwell might have been very useful to China. The same goes for Senator Feinstein's driver/spy, of course. There are no repercussions and little media interest in these Chinese intrusions. Yet somehow it was a good idea to tear our country apart looking for fabricated Trump-Russia election collusion for three years.
Rather than being outraged at a president's actual war on reporters, the media was honored to be punished for failure to serve The One properly. Only returning the anger that reporters demonstrated against Trump counted as a president's war on the media, I guess. Via Instapundit.
I still don't understand how people who warn about Islamist ideology that generates jihadis can be accused of being "Islamophobic." Aren't the people who cannot see the difference between the jihadi terror-friendly Islamists and the bulk of Moslems the real haters?
On-demand high-resolution satellite photograph service is coming online. The article mistakenly stated the satellite could see into buildings until corrected. But how long before that opacity is defeated? This is hastening the day of no privacy as I noted here and here concerning the science fiction book The Light of Other Days. It explored human reaction to the lack of any personal privacy. Science fiction is becoming science fact faster than I'd like in this area. And as a private entity asset, it also has implications for hastening the day of private military operations.
Japan is moving beyond missile defense to shoot down enemy nukes to "deterrence" with long-range missiles able to reach potential attackers. Precision conventional warheads can deter a bit, given that prior to precision small nuclear warheads were required for some targets. But this seems like a signal that Japan could eventually go nuclear if the threats continue to expand. Also, Japan will build its own stealth fighter to supplement F-35s.
Is it just me? Or does it annoy others that there are people who make a living being an online "influencer."
The World Court will take up the issue of the Venezuela-Guyana border. Venezuela doesn't want this intervention. I have to wonder if Maduro would order an invasion if the court rules for Guyana. While Venezuela's military is in shambles, Guyana has almost no military and has a tiny population. Would Brazil intervene to help Guyana?
From the damned if you do and damned if you don't files: "With Trump silent, reprisals for [Russian] hacks may fall to Biden[.]" One, we don't know that Trump didn't authorize quiet retaliation. And two, if Trump was loudly or even just visibly striking back, tell me that the exact same critics would be claiming that Trump was trying to start a war to justify nullifying the election and remaining in power. And three, was it as bad as so many are now saying given we knew about this in the spring? And remember, the Obama-Biden administration ignored Russia's August 2008 invasion of Georgia when it crafted its 2009 "Reset" initiative.
Sweden is experiencing a big rise in Xi Jinping Flu cases and deaths after what seemed like a relatively low level by the summer despite remaining largely open. Apparently Sweden failed to quarantine people coming in who were exposed to the virus. Heck, it may be that no strategy could have stopped the virus prior to herd immunity, whether by immunization or spread. I'd avoid real comparisons until this is over and we can establish uniform definitions for the purpose of comparing countries. But the early Swedish method wasn't the obvious way to go in response to the pandemic.
I see that Biden and Obama both went on TV for late night comedian "interviews." I guess we know what the shape of journalism will be for the next four years. Good God, the wet-kiss news media isn't friendly enough for them? Yes, yes, these aren't news people. But they are setting the standard for what Biden and Harris expect. The "hard" news people will grovel just as eagerly. And willingly.
Iran's global "Quds force" terrorist organization within the Iranian state. Poor Iranian finances and the decline of leftist terrorists in South America limit its power now, but with a base of operations in Venezuela it could ramp up if the Biden administration loosens the financial squeeze on the mullah regime. God help the world if Quds has access to nukes. If Iran wasn't a mullah-run despotism they'd be a natural ally against the jihadis from the Sunni world we've been battling for nearly twenty years on the Long War. That and other problems would be easier to solve without mullah-run Iran.
Of courseIran can get Xi Jinping Flu vaccines "despite" American sanctions. Iran is under sanctions and not under blockade by America. Iran blames sanctions for everything. Don't buy their BS. And given that Iran was hit hard early by their direct air links and high-level contacts with China, China is obviously a route for a vaccine. Don't put Iran's problems on America when the virus came from China and when the mullah rulers initially said Allah protected Iran's faithful from the virus. Maybe if Iran had a higher priority on coping with the pandemic rather than seeking nuclear weapons the Iranian people would be better off.
This is how you know that polls on most subjects are worthless: "In the poll, when asked, “Is President-elect Biden your president?” 56% said yes, 34% no, and 10% were not sure." The proper answer should have been 100% no because the president-elect is not the president! When he is sworn in (99% chance of that, although the 1% is almost exclusively the chance of Harris pushing Biden down a flight of stairs in the next three weeks rather than Trump proving enough voter fraud in that time) I will of course--regrettably--say yes, he is my president. Trump was my president. Obama was my president. Bush 43 was my president. And so on back to Eisenhower, in theory (good Lord, that hadn't occurred to me until just now). Maybe the pollsters should focus on honestly and accurately tracking voter polls for elections.
Police and armed local people in Nigeria rescued 84 of a reported 113 children kidnapped there. The children attended an Islamic school and the government called the kidnappers "bandits." Was it a "business" venture for profit, selling the kids back to families for ransom or to armed groups for "recruits?" Or could it have been attempted revenge for jihadis kidnapping children?
If I understand the rules of treating people, I think that because Doctor Johnny Fever is such an outstanding doctor that he should be named surgeon general by the Biden administration.
I always suspect that calculations of this sort are BS given that nobody has any way of judging what is reasonable for calculating how many--if any--civilizations developed in the galaxy. And this calculation has some big BS involved, such as assuming for the purpose of the calculations "intelligent creatures' tendency toward self-annihilation" as a given. How was that established as reasonable to assume? By looking at the survival rate of planetary civilizations? Um, that would be one--Earth--and the survival rate is 100%. How is it not biased to assume we will destroy ourselves contrary to the outcome so far and that projected outcome is the norm? This isn't science. Tip to Instapundit.