In the news business, "if it bleeds, it leads." Except when "it" is just the byproduct of what a female "does with her own body."
Tip to Instapundit.
I'm generally against abortion. But it isn't a high priority issue for me. But I'm surely against this house of horrors.
I thought the pro-abortion side said we'd only get these places if abortion was illegal. Why isn't the pro-abortion side against this? Or even willing to think it terribly newsworthy?
On the bright side, at least those pregnant women couldn't do something really bad like getting a 17-ounce soft drink in New York City.
UPDATE: It's amazing that there are those so loyal to the cause that they can claim there is no issue of bias with the lack of coverage of what is otherwise a (sadly and horrifyingly) newsworthy story.
About Me
- Brian J. Dunn
- I live and write in Ann Arbor, Michigan. University of Michigan AB and MA from Eastern Michigan University. One term in the Michigan Army National Guard. Former American history instructor and retired nonpartisan research analyst. I write on Blogger and Substack. Various military and private journals have published my occasional articles on military subjects. See "My Published Works" on the TDR web version or under the mobile version drop-down menu for citations and links.
