Would President Obama be having such a hard time persuading people here and abroad that attacking a Baathist, WMD-using Syrian dictator is the best option if Democrats hadn't spent the last 9 years twisting the facts by arguing that Bush lied us into an unnecessary war against a far worse Baathist, WMD-using Iraqi dictator based on the consensus of the leading intelligence agencies?
UPDATE: Related thoughts from the Instapundit.
UPDATE: Michael Barone addresses the subject, too.
About Me
- Brian J. Dunn
- I live and write in Ann Arbor, Michigan. University of Michigan AB and MA from Eastern Michigan University. One term in the Michigan Army National Guard. Former American history instructor and retired nonpartisan research analyst. I write on Blogger and Substack. Various military and private journals have published my occasional articles on military subjects. See "My Published Works" on the TDR web version or under the mobile version drop-down menu for citations and links.
