Pages

Wednesday, August 01, 2012

The Resistance We Have

Foreign policy "realists" like to argue that we can cut deals with thug regimes rather than sponsor resistance to the thug regimes. The Iraq War remains their prime example for the results of promoting regime change (despite the victory we achieved there). We tried the counter-policy of an outstretched open hand to the Iranian regime by stiff-arming the opposition in 2009 and it didn't work. People seem to be getting uncomfortable with who is resisting Assad (and some are despicable). But if it is the height of realism to support ugly-if-necessary entities, why aren't the realists all in for the Syrian resistance?

Since last month's bomb attack, the fighting has become more intense, reaching into Damascus and Aleppo for the first time in the 17-month-old uprising against the Assad dynasty.

Video footage posted on the Internet appeared to show that rebel fighters were carrying out summary executions in Aleppo in much the same way as government forces have been accused of acting in Damascus.

One video showed four men identified as members of the pro-Assad Shabbiha militia being led down a flight of stair, lined up against a wall and shot in a hail of rifle fire as onlookers shouted "God is Greatest".

I'm not happy that the Assad regime faces resistance by some pretty awful elements inside Syria (who arrived at the invitation of Assad for use against us, originally) rather than by the League of Women Voters direct action wing. But you go to proxy war with the resistance you have and not the resistance you wish you had.

I know that some of the resistance are thug terrorists. But they are helping to drive out an enemy of the United States (Assad), knock a major weapon out of the hand of Assad's sponsor (Iran), and giving China's and Russia's thug-protection racket a setback.

Shouldn't realists be willing to pay the price for these worthy objectives? Besides, the Syrian people seem willing to pay the price to get rid of Assad for their own reasons.

One thing at a time. Get rid of Assad while preparing the less objectionable resistance for the next round to suppress the jihadis.