Pages

Sunday, February 19, 2012

The Wrong Consensus

I'm sure the global warmers who go on about climate change being "settled" and about letting "science guide our policies" won't agree that science is either settled or should guide our policies on this issue (tip to Instapundit), quoting a ScienceNow article:

A controversial method of drilling for natural gas, called fracking, has boomed in recent years—as have concerns over its potential to cause environmental contamination and harm human health. But a major review of the practice, released today, uncovered no signs that it is causing trouble below ground. “We found no direct evidence that fracking itself has contaminated groundwater,” said Charles Groat of the University of Texas, Austin, who led the study. ...

As part of the review, 16 researchers at UT Austin, in fields ranging from air quality to hydrology, reviewed the scientific literature and regulatory documents for three major areas of fracking, in Texas, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania and New York. They could not find evidence of drilling fluids leaking deep underground, and methane in water wells in some areas is probably due to natural sources. The team did not see a need for new regulations specific to fracking, but for better enforcement of existing regulations of drilling in general—such as those covering well casing and disposal of wastewater from drilling.

Perhaps I'm too cynical. But after Greens went from supporting natural gas usage as a lower-carbon alternative to oil as a bridge leading to their alternative energy Utopia to opposing newly abundant natural gas because of fracking--which threatens to be the destination of an oil alternative rather than a bridge--I think I'm entitled.