Pages

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Green on Green

NOTE: Blogger still seems to be working on the May 12th glitch. This just reappeared as a draft, although it originally went up on the morning of the 12th. Strangely, another post came up as a draft that they already restored. I'm afraid to kill it just in case. And I know one other post for sure is still missing. Anyway, this was my post for that day:

I know a lot of people want to say to Hell with the Afghans because of instances where Afghans in uniform shoot an American comrade. Many are Taliban who have infiltrated security forces or just pro-Taliban. I've written that our losses surely pale in comparison to what the other side endures.

Strategypage comes to my rescue on this score:

Taliban dying for al Qaeda does not go down well with many Taliban. Al Qaeda is seen as a bunch of arrogant foreigners who look down on all Afghans. This attitude is not appreciated by Afghans, and has led to the deaths of hundreds of al Qaeda members (at the hands of their Taliban allies) over the last five years. But for appearance sake, the two terrorist groups still go through the motions of being the best of friends.

Remember, too, that only a very small portion of our allied Afghans turn on us. The vast, overwhelming, and nearly unanimous percent of our Afghan allies point their weapons at the Taliban and we cannot win without them. Would you really push aside Afghan forces in order to have Americans operate alone and only die from Taliban and al Qaeda in the field?

Americanizing the fight to avoid these few incidents of Afghans killing our troops would snatch defeat from the jaws of our accumulating victory.