RAND has a monograph out on cyber-wafare.
Basically, they think strategic offensive cyber-warfare isn't worth the effort; tactical offensive cyber-warfare is useful to assist conventional attacks; and defensive cyber-warfare is worth the effort.
That seems reasonable. I've long said that if cyber-attackers hit our homeland, why shouldn't our response be to JDAM the offenders in response? Blow up their computer complexes or hit their infrastructure?
About Me
- Brian J. Dunn
- I live and write in Ann Arbor, Michigan. University of Michigan AB and MA from Eastern Michigan University. One term in the Michigan Army National Guard. Former American history instructor and retired nonpartisan research analyst. I write on Blogger and Substack. Various military and private journals have published my occasional articles on military subjects. See "My Published Works" on the TDR web version or under the mobile version drop-down menu for citations and links.
