Pages

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Albatross

Jonah Goldberg rightly notes that our Left was not defanged after 9/11 (link corrected). Though they kept quiet for a while, they never stopped thinking that America is the biggest problem in the world. Their rebirth was natural.

But this doesn't mean they should have the impact they have today. Their rise was predictable and President Bush failed to lead our country to counter the poison or Left injected into the body politic:

This might sound unfair, but if George Bush had been a better president, John Edwards would never have dreamed of calling the war on terror nothing but a bumper sticker. As it stands right now, if any Democratic candidate other than Joe Biden or maybe Hillary Clinton (!) gets elected we will bug out of Iraq so precipitously it will be indistinguishable from abject defeat in the eyes of the world. And under any of them, the war on terror will become a glorified Elliot Spitzer style legal campaign. That is not a sign that President Bush has adequately led the country or prepared it for the struggles ahead.

It quickly became a cliché that 9/11 changed everything, but when it comes to the basic divisions of the last 20 years, 9/11 didn’t change nearly enough so much as accentuate everything we knew before. And that all but guarantees we’ll have another 9/11 of which to ponder the meaning.


Normon Podhoretz writes of much the same thing about our Left. But he is more optimistic, I think, than Jonah:

It is impossible at this point to predict how and when the battle of Iraq will end. But from the vitriolic debates it has unleashed we can already say for certain that the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, did not do to the Vietnam syndrome what Pearl Harbor did to the old isolationism. The Vietnam syndrome is back and it means to have its way. But is it strong enough in its present incarnation to do what it did to the honor of this country in 1975? Well acquainted though I am with its malignant power, I still believe that it will ultimately be overcome by the forces opposed to it in the war at home. Even so, I cannot deny that this question still hangs ominously in the air and will not be answered before more damage is done to the long struggle against Islamofascism into which we were blasted six years ago and that I persist in calling World War IV.


I think we can win our war in Iraq and the Long War generally despite the handicap of carting around the dead weight of our Left, which would never be caught dead rooting for our country at war under a Republican president. And I have hope that we will win without needing the reminder that another 9/11 would provide us.