Where they looking in the refrigerators of House members, or what? Do they consider it only a "relationship" if al Qaeda was sharing office space and a receptionist in downtown Baghdad? Do they forget that President Clinton struck the pharmaceutical plant in Sudan in 1998 precisely because of the al Qaeda-Iraq connection in relation to poison gas?
I find it amazing that our Senate sees nothing. I understand why the loyal opposition wants to ignore connections, but why the majority party? Having trouble at cocktail parties, are they?
Read this instead and ignore the silly report by a committee of the world's greatest debilitated body. The judgment here:
But beyond the obvious political gamesmanship, there is little merit to this posturing because there is little serious analysis in the Senate report: Far from providing the definitive word on Saddam's ties to al Qaeda, the report is almost worthless.
Read it all, as the saying goes. What a Senate we have.
