Pages

Saturday, October 15, 2005

Mistakes in Iraq

VDH reminds me of another mistake in Iraq that the Zawahiri letter highlights:

Many of al-Zarqawi or Dr. Zawahiri’s intercepted letters and communiqués reveal paranoid fears that Iraq is indeed becoming lost — but to the terrorists. The enemy speaks of constantly shifting tactics — try beheading contractors; no, turn to slaughtering Shiites; no, butcher teachers and school kids; no, go back to try to blow up American convoys. In contrast, we are consistent in our strategy — go after jihadists, train Iraqi security forces, promote consensual government so Iraq becomes an autonomous republic free to determine its own future.

The rest of Hanson's piece is excellent, but this reminder of a basic truth of war is useful: it is better to resolutely carry out a mediocre strategy than to rapidly shift strategy looking for the perfect strategy. This is exactly what the insurgents and terrorists have done. Shifting targets before one can really judge whether that target is being seriously affected has spared each of their targets from reaching their breaking point. By constantly changing targets, the enemy has failed to put pressure on one point long enough to do real damage.

Meanwhile, the new Iraq gets stronger and stronger every day. And one day soon, we will be able to pull out of most of the day-to-day fight and the enemy will never really know it since the pressure will be just as great as it was six months ago when we were the almost-exclusive offensive force.

There have been lots of mistakes made in the fight in Iraq. But the most critical mistakes have been made by our enemies. This is what victory looks like.