Mark Steyn takes a tour of Dr. Michael Mann's science expertise, thus showing that Mann has a higher chance of liberal arts major judges declaring Mann a reputable climate scientist in Mann's suit against Steyn, et. al., than having actual scientists confirm Mann's scientific integrity.
Well, let's say Mann's purported science expertise, since there is a court case going on. I wouldn't want to pre-judge the issue.
I normally don't write such posts until my Koch brothers check clears, but what the heck. I'm feeling all pan-denialist.